PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN
A Publication of the Botanical Society of America, Inc.
March 1973 Vol. 19 No. 1
The Potential of Audio-Tutorial Systems of Instruction R. N. Hurst and S. N Postlethwait 2
Is Audio-Tutorial Always Justified? William R. Bowen 3
Reflections after the Symposium on Systematic Biological Collections, July 6-8, 1972 F. R. Fosberg 4
The Teaching of Higher Plant Morphology in the United States, Opinion/Commentary D. R. Kaplan 6
AIBS Manpower Questionnaire 7
The Amherst Meeting 9
Welcome to 1,600 New Members! 9
Current Thought in Plant Ecology 9
Editor's Notes 9
XII International Botanical Congress June 23-30, 1975 10
Botanical Potpourri 10
Botanical Society of America, Inc. Officers for 1973 12
Botanical Society of America, Inc. Committees-1973 14
Minutes of the Business Meeting Botanical Society of America 15
Citations for Awards Presented at the Annual Banquet, 1972 16
Corresponding Members, Botanical Society of America, 1972 17
Exotic Mushrooms, Henri Romagnesi 17
Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, V. C. Runecles and J. E. Watkins, eds. 18
A Computer-Mapped Flora - A Study of the County of Warwickshire, D. A. Cadbury, J. G. Hawkes and R. C. Readett 18
Horticultural Science, 2nd ed., Jules Janick 19
Viability of Seeds, E. H. Roberts 19
Algen Flora der Ostsee. 1. Bentos (Blau-, Grun-, Braun-, and Rotalgen) Helmut Pankow 19
Pollen and Spores of Chile, Calvin J. Heusser 20
The Potential of Audio-Tutorial Systems of Instruction1
R. N. Hurst and S. N Postlethwait
Neither its strongest supporter nor its severest critic could deny the impact
of the Audio-Tutorial System of instruction on education - especially education
in the biological sciences. This short paper will assume that the impact has
been, for the most part, favorable, and that the modifications of the initial
system which will be suggested here will have further impact, also, for the
most part, favorable.
The original Audio-Tutorial format designed, implemented and modified since
1961 by S. N. Postlethwait was considerably altered in 1969 when the concepts
of' minicourse packaging and learning for mastery were introduced into courses
in botany and zoology at Purdue University. A different instructional package
was needed to facilitate individual pacing, and to create the possibility
of various individual curricula within the course. The latter situation would
create the potential of variable course credit among the individual students
enrolled in the course. A different instructional package was also needed
to facilitate student recycling which would become necessary with a learning
for mastery system. This package was the minicourse.
Minicourses are, just as their name implies, little courses. Each has a beginning
and an end, and each relates to another in virtually the same pattern as one
course in any college curriculum relates to another. So some have prerequisites;
others do not. Some carry more credit and so are more intense or longer than
others. Just as some courses involve labs, field trips or demonstrations or
as some are more visual than others, minicourses may vary one from another.
Minicourse content is perhaps more logical than the content of some courses
(which may be artifically inclusive of specific topics within a given discipline).
Minicourses are designed around a single topic or idea or principle. These
divisions are much more natural.
Just as college students in the still-remembered past were offered more individualized
curricula when a variety of courses replaced the single curriculum all students
were expected to follow upon enrolling, so minicourses further individualize
the curriculum. In the Bioligy 108-109 package, it is possible that no two
students will complete the courses having taken exactly the same sequence
All students do complete a core of minicourses essential to a student's background
in an introductory biology sequence — this to protect them in their
enrollment in subsequent courses. About twenty percent of all mini-courses
completed, however, are chosen by the student, based on his interests and
perhaps his educational objectives, from an extensive group of optional minicourses.
Thus each student has some control over his fate in the course, and within
some limits can tailor the package to fit his individual needs and interests.
Very likely, the list of "core" minicourses currently considered absolutely
essential to a student enrolled in introductory botany or zoology can be drastically
reduced and more curricular option given to the student.
Also, why should every student in every option using the 108-109 sequence
take 8 credit hours of biology, (4 credit hours for each course)? The answer
is, they probably shouldn't. Horticulture students may require fewer animal
minicourses than do the animal science students. Students in agricultural
economics or agricultural engineering may need less biology than either of
the first two options. Department heads and curriculum committees can make
decisions easily on how many and which minicourses their students should perhaps
complete because specific objectives are part of every minicourse. By assigning
the appropriate fraction of a semester credit hour to each minicourse - a
simple task actually - variable credit hour packages can be created. Students
can complete their own specific package in the same Learning Center and in
the same quiz sections as other students completing a totally different package.
Students transferring some biology credit from another college can have individual
packages of minicourses designed for them which include only the specific
minicourses needed by them to obtain a background equivalent to other students
in their same option.
What about the housewife or the business man or the farmer who would like
one semester credit hour in biology, or who would like to know "something"
about genetics, or minteral nutrition, photosynthesis or birth control or
whatever? The minicourse format permits that kind of student access to specific
areas of interest or need without the necessity of an enrollment in and completion
of an entire course. The potential then in continuing or extension or adult
education is unlimited.
Consider also the disadvantaged student. Specific minicourses designed to
eliminate specific deficiencies make more sense than enrollment in an entire
course when the deficiency may not be nearly as broad as the course content.
Instead of giving the patient one of' each pill on the shelf to cure the condition,
diagnosis followed by prescription of fewer specific pills, possibly even
one, is the treatment required. Instructional packages like the minicourse
can function in this capacity.
The "frosting on the cake" touch to an Audio-Tutorial system of instruction
can be added by adopting the concept of learning for mastery. Does it make
sense to purport that what you as a teacher want most is to teach your students
some botany when you test them and then cast aside or reject those that did
not learn; when you do not establish a mechanism through which these "not
so able" or "not so diligent" students can recycle'? If we test the biology
knowledge level of students before an instructional period begins, chances
are we would obtain a "normal" curve or a curve of random distribution. With
the usual pattern of grading at the end of this instructional period, chances
are great that those same students will be scattered on another curve or random
1Presented al the A.I.B.S. meetings, Minneapolis, Minn,, August
28, 1972 as part of a symposium: "Potentials and Limitations of Audio-Tutorial
Instruction, sponsored by the Teaching Section, Botanical Society of America.
This paper and the one following by Mr. Bowen are the first of four that will
be published in PSB based on this symposium.-ed.
distribution. Does this mean the educational process itself has been random'?
Not necessarily because hopefully the entire curve has been shifted toward
the up side.
But it does mean that we have been willing to quit or stop while those students
at the lower end of the curve are perhaps not much better off than the students
at the higher end of the curve before instruction began. It might also mean
that from one group to another, one semester to another, we may change our
grading standards as the curve shifts to the right or left. It makes more
sense to establish a standard, a minimal standard which all students must
achieve, and then devise a system whereby the student might recycle, if the
need is present, until he reaches that standard. The student then is required
to master at some minimal level all the material he is responsible for in
There are those who would maintain that the usual pattern of grading has
this potential built into it. The F student didn't reach the minimum and can
or must recycle through the course. Perhaps that student in botany, however,
knew plant structure very well, but didn't do well on photosynthesis and respiration.
Is it right to recycle him through all of botany when all he really didn't
know was photosynthesis and respiration?
If minimal standards were set for each minicourse (and they probably ought
to be set no lower than at a C level of mastery), it would be possible to
hold that student to that standard on each and every minicourse in his specific
package of minicourses. Recycling through a minicourse on photosynthesis is
more logical than recycling through an entire botany course. The Audio-Tutorial
system and the minicourse package make a mastery learning situation easy to
implement. A mini-course can be made available to students until each student
has satisfactorily completed that minicourse while the rest of the carrels
in the Learning Center can be set up with subsequent minicourses. Individual
pacing is the natural consequence of this system.
Ideally, the instructor should perhaps hold out for a minimal level of A
work from all his students, but realistically, he may find it prudent to settle
for a B or perhaps a C minimal level. Traditions and traditional thinking
fade slowly, if at all.
Learning for mastery means that time not performance becomes the variable
in the educational process, and this concept in turn puts a different complexion
on the idea of aptitude. Aptitude becomes nothing more than a measure of time
needed by a student to accomplish some task. This idea was first presented
by Carroll in 1963 (Carroll, J. 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers
College Record, 64:723-33). The student in a mastery learning situation also
learns to expect success and associate success with learning. In a society
where so much new knowledge becomes available each year that no one can afford
to stop his pursuit of education at any time-in his life, this positive attitude
toward education may be the most important trade off in a learning for mastery
situation. Whatever else it does, learning for mastery functions to promote
success and eliminate failure.
The concepts of minicourses and mastery have in-creased the potential of
the Audio-Tutorial system of instruction by increasing the flexibility of
the system. New twists to old systems should always increase the flexibility
not the lockstep of the system. For those working with the Audio-Tutorial
format, minicourses and mastery are recommended to you as techniques for in-creasing
flexibility. With flexibility comes the option of trying out promising new
ideas and procedures.
Is Audio-Tutorial Always Justified?
William R. Bowen
The Audio-Tutorial system has, since its advent in the early 1960's (Postlethwait,
et al., 1964; Postlethwait, 1967), had a marked impact on biological education.
It has been widely adopted, the results ranging from success to failure. Audio-Tutorial
does provide certain educational advantages when properly employed but, as
Ehrle (1970) noted, the Audio-Tutorial system does not "solve all educational
For students, some of the tangible advantages of the Audio-Tutorial approach
can be: (1) an opportunity to work with content material at their own "pace"
and thereby provide the slow-learner with the same opportunities as the fast-learner,
(2) exposure to an enriching presentation of content through multi-media hardware,
and (3) a greater degree of interaction with the teacher. For teachers, (1)
freedom from inflexible teaching schedules, (2) better coordination of lecture
and laboratory content, and (3) an economical means of handling high enrollments
are often cited as advantages.
But are these advantages always attained with the adoption of Audio Tutorial?
The answer is no. Ehrle (1970) noted that it is the dedication and attitudes
of the staff involved in the design, development, and implementation of an
Audio-Tutorial program, and not the virtues of the system itself, that ultimately
leads to suecess or failure. One of the greatest dangers lies in the belief
that the adoption of Audio-Tutorial will bring with it the flair and enthusiasm
of its creator, Dr. Samuel N. Postlethwait. It simply will not. A poor teacher
and/or course will remain just what they were before Audio-Tutorial—poor!
And a greater student interest in biology will not be forthcoming simply because
content presentation has been mechanized (Gering, 1972). Audio-Tutorial programs
unfortunately tend to rely heavily, and sometimes wholly, on "canned" laboratory
work, e.g., demonstrations, pictorial displays, etc. Direct student involvement
with lining biology is all too often lacking. The student simply does not
get his hands dirty.
Another important "if"' is the real cost of adopting Audio-Tutorial. Without
question, the Audio-Tutorial system has proved to be an economical means of
"humanizing" those introductory biology courses with a seemingly overwhelming
number of students. But Hahn (1971) has shown that, while the expense per
student is not relatively high, the initial expense of hardware to implement
an Audio-Tutorial program could be prohibitively high — as in the small
college. There is also the problem of the right personnel being available
for the necessary design and development unless an already existing program
is "lifted" intact. It is- even possible
today for a "money-conscious" administration to misconstrue the extra time
that ultimately will be available for greater student-faculty contact as instead
an opportunity for staff reduction. The latter could be a costly proposition
for schools where such cutbacks in staff result in a serious erosion in the
quality and diversity of basic programs.
This brings me to a thought foremost in my mind; namely, is Audio-Tutorial
the only means of achieving the advantages that are potentially inherent in
its adoption? That is, are there other "systems in which the student could
work successfully at his own pace and in a manner that is basically independent?
The answer is yes. Vuke (1964) noted that "if one wanted to modify the (Audio-Tutorial)
technique and eliminate the expense of the tape playback equipment, the instructions
could be programmed on printed materials." The Position-Programmed approach
represents an effort in that direction in which the student is provided with
programmed written materials, in lieu of the taped materials for Audio-Tutorial,
and pertinent illustrative material (Abell, 1969). In the Auto-Tutorial approach
(Bowen, 1968; Bowen, 1969), the use of pertinent do-it-yourself laboratory
experimentation is integrated into programmed printed materials in a manner
that provides a "learn through doing" learning experience in living biology.
Such experiences can be structured into week-long modules which, not only
serve to coordinate lecture and laboratory material, but make feasible the
use of open laboratories and multi-media enrichment in non Audio-Tutorial
Abell, D. L. 1969. New patterns of laboratory instruction. CUEBS Working
Bowen, W. R. 1968. An auto-tutorial approach to teaching biology. Amer. Jour.
Botany, 55(pt. 2):740.
Bowen, W. R. 1969. Experimental Cell Biology. Macmillan Co., New York.
Ehrle, E. B. 1971. Avoiding the audio-tutorial mistake. BioScience, 20(2):103.
Gering, R. L. 1972. Individualized instruction in education today. Ward's
PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN
ROBERT W. LONG, Editor
Life Science Bldg. 174
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida 33620
Elwood B. Ehrle, Mankato State College
Adolph Hecht, Washington State University
Donald R. Kaplan, University of California (Berkeley)
Erich Steiner, University of Michigan
Beryl S. Vuilleumier, Smithsonian Institutuin
March 1973 Volume Nineteen Number
Changes of Address: Notify the Treasurer of the Botanical Society
of America, Inc., Dr. C. Ritchie Bell, Department of Botany, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 26514.
Subscriptions for libraries and persons not members of the Botanical
Society of America are obtainable at the rate of $4.00 a year. Send orders with
checks payable to "Botanical Society of America, Inc." to the Treasurer.
Material submitted for publication should be type-written double-spaced,
and sent in duplicate to the Editor. Copy should follow the style of recent
issues of the Bulletin.
Microfilms of Plant Science Bulletin are available from University
Microfilms, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106.
The Plant Science Bulletin is published quarterly at the University of South
Florida, 4202 Fowler Ave., Tampa, Fla. 33620. Second class postage paid at Tampa,
Hahn, T. C. 1971. Audio-tutorial instruction: A case study. BioScience, 21(15):814-819.
Postlethwait, S. N. 1967. Teaching tools and techniques: An audio-tutorial
approach to teaching. Pacific Speech, 1(4):57-62. Postlethwait, S. N., J.
Novak, and H. Murray. 1964. An integrated experience approach to learning,
with emphasis on independent study. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis.
Vuke, G. 1964. Book review (Plant Science — A Workbook with an Audio
Program Approach, by S. N. Postlethwait). Amer. Biol. Teacher, 26(7):528.
Reflections after the Symposium
on Systematic Biological
Collections, July 6-8, 1972
F. R. Fos berg
Falls Church, Va.
The basic task of the science of systematic biology is, of course, to construct
a system or classification of organisms that will arrange them according to
as nearly natural or evolutionary relationships as possible and that will
accommodate all species that exist or have existed on the earth. Such a classification
will provide a framework on which can be arranged all information that is
or becomes available about any and all of these organisms. This is, or course,
a continuing responsibility and is the scientific raison-d'etre of systematic
biology. It is the aim of most of the research activities of the workers in
the field, and, in a rational intellectual culture, would provide ample justification
for the expenditure of whatever financial resources were needed to do it at
a modest but steady rate.
However, our culture is neither basically rational nor intellectual, but,
rather, is motivated by economic factors or by drives generally translatable
into economic terms. This means that to get even minimal continuing support,
the results coming from systematic botany must be translatable into economic
values because direct, understandable benefits must accrue to the people,
who ultimately provide the money. To put is crudely, the manin-the-street,
the average voter and tax-payer, couldn't care less about the scientific aims
of systematic botany, in fact, would not know the meaning of the term if he
heard it. Therefore, it is very improbable that his representatives who control
government expenditures would likely provide much support for it, regardless
of our persuasion.
However, information about plants and animals is a salable commodity. Society
needs more and more of it, and will continue to. Everyone — from agriculturists
to drug manufacturers, military men, timbermen, medical men, ecologists, amateur
gardeners, wildlife managers, county planners, and many others — needs
biological in-formation of diverse sorts at one time or another. Such in-formation
is produced by biologists of all sorts, and any one of them can supply the
products of his own specialty. However, the biological classification, product
of systematic biology, provides a ready access to all such knowledge that
can be associated with a taxon or systematic group.
This classification is the basic system of access to and retrieval of information
whether the mechanism of storage and retrieval is a cross file or index, a
book, a computer, or a human mind. Without it, biologically organized information
would be an impossibility. It is as yet, an imperfect creation. It must provide
a natural arrangement of up to 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 species, living and
fossil, many of them not even known yet.
Significant improvements in this classification are, and can be, made only
by trained systematic biologists (whether or not this is their only or principal
job), and there are remarkably few of these, in relation to the size and difficulty
of the task. Their work varies in quality with their innate ability, experience,
and training, with the time available for their tasks, and with the number
and condition of the specimens available to them. The process of building
the classification is one of continuous revision and improvement.
The basic operation in using this classification to gain access to the stored
information is identification. Whether this is done by using books with keys,
a biologist who knows the organism, a collection for comparison, or a computer,
this is the operation that must precede any information retrieval if the information
is about a plant or animal. Identification is only possible if the organism
is known and has a place in the classification. It is only likely to be correct
if the particular segment of the classification is adequate and up-to-date.
It is, of course, obvious that the matter of priorities could be simply disposed
of by giving the highest priority to perfecting the biological classification
and second priority to providing an identification service to utilize this
classification for the public good. This sort of ordering of priorities does
not help much. The plan pr strategy for accomplishing this will have many
components and it is among these that priorities must be established. Such
priorities, of course, should be deter-mined by their relation to the accomplishment
of the main task of perfecting the classification and to the public service
functions and duties of the enterprise.
I do not think one can make a clear separation between the functions of the
collections and those of the systematists or users of the collections in this
context, certainly not in the establishment of priorities. Nor is a clean-cut
linear order of priorities, where one task would be finished before another
begins, feasible or even desirable. Theoretically, of course, information
must be assembled before it can be organized into a classification. The classification,
in theory, must be constructed before mechanisms are perfected for identification
of individual organisms (specimens). These tasks, again in theory, must be
completed before the process of organizing biological information according
to the classification.
However, the gigantic task of discovering, studying and classifying the possible
10,000,000 species of organisms has already been going on from the dawn of
civilization, and in a formal, written-down fashion for over 2,000 years.
A large proportion of the biological species have been discovered and at least
part of the in-formation on each has been recorded and incorporated into the
classification. The rough outlines of the classification have already taken
shape, more clearly in some parts than in others. Identifications are made,
more or less adequately, of most known organisms. The classification is most
adequate and the associated in-formation most nearly complete in the temperate
and polar regions, where the most biological work has been done and the fewest
species of organisms occur. The adequacy here is only relative. In the tropics
the work is hardly well started in many areas. In no area, anywhere, can even
a biological inventory, let alone a thorough organization of the needed information
be said to be completed.
Only in recent years has the realization come home to most of us that destruction
of natural biotic communities is progressing so fast that much valuable biological
in-formation and even many species are being lost irrevocably. Already many
species are only known, and will only be known from museum specimens, photographs,
and secondary recorded information. Now we begin to realize that the rate
of this process of biological impoverishment is exponentially increasing.
It is clear that a great many tropical organisms will disappear before they
are ever studied, some even before any specimens are collected and preserved.
This has become a matter of widespread concern, but only the biologists, and
especially the systematists, are well enough informed to express valid opinions
These facts tend to alter our possible scale of priorities and to upset any
idea of a logical order of development of biological knowledge and classification.
An urgency is placed upon getting and preserving all biological information,
especially primary information in the form of actual material and photos that
is in any danger of being lost. We owe this, not only to our descendents,
but even to ourselves — the degradation is going on so rapidly.
A far greater value is thus also acquired by our ac-cumulated museum collections.
They become our only reliable records of many biological facts that are no
longer easily available, indeed, in many cases not available at all any more.
Far more urgent, also, has become the provision of adequate facilities for
preparation and care of material being collected now or in the future. It
is no longer easy to "go out and collect some more", even no longer possible
in many cases. Of course, the indispensable nomenclatural type specimens,
a primary and unavoidable responsibility of systematic collections, by definition
cannot be replaced.
The task of the systematist and biogeographer has also been augmented by
the urgent necessity to establish the status of rare and endangered species
— not only those of showy birds and game animals, but of plants, snails,
salamanders, insects, and all other groups, especially terrestrial ones. Intelligent
efforts to preserve and protect them cannot be made unless we know what they
are, where, and under what circumstances they live, and from what sources
the threats to their existence come. Only the systematists and the local naturalists
have the background to determine these things.
There is no question but that a number of the activities of systematists
and systematic collections must be carried on simultaneously, in order that
the main tasks be accomplished or that the materials for their future accomplishment
Of number one priority, then, are the tasks of col-_ lecting and observing
organisms in threatened habitats; of caring adequately for the material collected
and pre-served, i. e., the provision for adequate support of our systematic
collections; of recording the variation and reproductive and population behavior
of species, especially those in as yet not seriously disturbed habitats; and
of providing identification guides for the different groups by regions, in
order to give the interested public some measure of access to our accumulated
information. Concomittent with these, and of equal importance, is the training
of young systematists and passing on to them as much as possible of the benefits
of our .experience.
The function of systematics in providing an organizational framework for
and access to the enormous and unwieldy mass of biological information must
be stressed in the proposed national plan for systematic biology. If it is
presented in clear terms related to the needs of the users, lay as well as
scientific, of biological information — support for systematic biology
more readily secured. If the central and indispensable role of collections
as the essential base of primary in-formation on which systematics feeds is
made clear, both to our scientific colleagues and to those who control fiscal
decisions, public and private, the systematic collections would receive as
adequate support as do other essential public services.
The Teaching of Higher Plant
Morphology in the United States
Following the influence of Coulter and Chamberlain at the turn of the century,
the teaching of plant morphology iii the United States has become almost synonymous
with the study of plant life histories in a semi-taxonomic survey of the plant
kingdom. As a result, the reproductive aspects of plant structure tend to
receive the lion's share of attention whereas features of general organization
and organography are usually relegated to a brief but often inaccurate description
of the plant's "habit'.' While this outlook may be justified in treatments
of algae and fungi where vegetative morphology is simpler and reproductive
structures more complex, it seems less defensible iii the study of higher
plants where the reverse is true. Furthermore, when taught only within the
taxonomic fl amework presently in vogue, morphology emerges simply as a handmaiden
of systematics rather than a basic science in its own right.
It should be appreciated that our country's conception of plant morphology
is largely an Anglo-American view that is not necessarily shared by other
botanists in the world. It is particularly in the Austro-Germanic countries
of Europe, where morphological thought has reached its most sophisticated
development, that a different conception exists. There, "comparative morphology"
is synonymous with the study of the gross morphological relationships of plant
organs("organography"),whereas "plant anatomy" is usually equated with the
study of tissue organization and cell types. Hence we really do not teach
comparative morphology in this sense in the U. S. but instead emphasize the
histological and cytological features almost to the exclusion of the more
general principles of plant form.
In Germany, in particular, comparative morphology has developed as a rigorously
analytical science in which the structure of higher plants is studied in terms
of the patterns of symmetry, modes of branching and differences in development
responsible for the diversity of form. Moreover, this morphological diversity
is often considered in relation to the habitats in which the various species
grow in an effort to understand the adaptive significance of each structural
variant. With this approach it is the organographic categories (such as shoot,
leaf and root, for example) which form the framework of the subject matter
rather than the taxonomic system; systematic comparisons are thus made within
this morphological context where they are relevant. In the 20th century Karl
Von Goebel and Wilhelm Troll have been the most vigorous advocates of this
point of view. Through their own re-searches and those of their disciples,
they have provided a rich literature which is still, however, a relatively
untapped resource for our morphological teaching.
For some time I have felt that since morphology has its own principles and
phenomenology, there was no reason that it could not be taught along the same
lines as courses in physiology and anatomy, neither of which relies strictly
on a systematic treatment for presentation. It seemed that the principles
of plant organization could fitst be elucidated and then applied secondarily
(either in the same course or in a separate second course) to an evolutionary
treatment of the major plant groups. For this reason I attempted to incorporate
the organographic approach into my own teaching and developed an upper division
course entitled "The principles of plant morphology." The course begins with
a consideration of the origin of organization in embryogenesis and then proceeds
through the following subjects: morphology of germination; shoot growth and
symmetry; branching; morphological specializations of the shoot, including
storage shoots, shoots of succulents and vines; and then onto a discussion
of the comparative morphology of leaves and roots and their specialization.
It then considers the adaptation of the whole body for divergent life strategies
including that of aquatic plants, epiphytes and parasites, and concludes with
a treatment of the relation of reproductive morphology to the entire plant
body. In each special topic comparisons are made not only within the range
of vascular plant structure but examples are also drawn from the bryophytes,
algae and fungi where they are germane.
The response of students to this approach has been quite enthusiastic. They
have come to feel that a course of this nature has the following advantages:
(1) through the examination of a number of variants of the same organizational
theme, they have a more profound understanding of the fundamentals of plant
organization with a minimum of memorization; (?) the emphasis on morphological
principles permits them to carry from the classroom a viewpoint that can be
applied, without the use of complicated technical equipment, to the analysis
of the structure of unknown or seemingly anomalous plant species; (3) having
studied groups where relatively minor morphological changes have produced
every structural intermediate (such as in Cactaceae),they emerge from the
course with a more valid appreciation of plant evolution than they do in courses
which expect them to simply memorize current phylogenetic dogma; (4) because
they study some of the most interesting plant groups rather than the relatively
dull but "typical" representatives of each taxonomic category, their interest
in botany and plant morphology is enhanced; and (5) because the adaptational
significance of the structural diversity is explored, the relationship of
plant morphology to other disciplines, such as physiology and ecology, becomes
more apparent; hence morphology seems less isolated than it does in the more
Obviously the re-introduction of' organographic principles to morphological
teaching should not be done at the expense of the usual reproductive survey.
Both are essential to our teaching of structural botany. To simply substitute
the orientation I advocate would he as much in error as the persent deletion
of organography from our curriculum. I would only suggest that such a phylogenetic
survey might best be preceded by a course oriented strictly toward morphological
principles. (Presumably the students would have mastered the essentials of
plant life histories and the defining characteristics of the major plant groups
in their elementary biology or botany courses; therefore the same approach
would not have to be reiterated in greater detail at the upper division level,
as is currently the trend.) This would then provide equal
(Continued on Page 9)
Special Notice to All Members of the Botanical Society of America
At the special request of AIBS, there is reproduced below a "Manpower- Questionnaire"
that is the basis for a survey of the state of economic health of biologists
in general. All members of the Botanical Society, including student and regular
members. are asked to complete the information sheet, tear off from PSB, and
mail to AIBS. The questionnaire is self-addressed.—ed.
(Continued from Page 6)
representation of both approaches and at the same time compensate for the
lack of depth of botanical teaching in our already overburdened general biology
courses. In the final analysis I believe that the benefits derived from both
the stimulation and renewal of research interest in plant morphology would
more than repay the effort involved in making such a revision.
Donald R. Kaplan University of California, Berkeley and
Fairchild Tropical Garden, Miami
The Amherst Meeting
The Botanical Society of America will hold its annual meeting in conjunction
with the American Institute of Biological Sciences at the University of Massachusetts
at Amherst, Massachusetts, June 17-22, 1973. The Call for Papers was sent
out to members last fall, and the final scheduling for the Society is now
being worked out by Program Director Dr. Augustus DeMaggio. Forms for advanced
registration and for housing accomodations will he published in forthcoming
issues of Bioscience. Those planning to attend the Amherst Meeting are requested
to obtain the official registration and housing applications from Bioscience,
or they may be obtained by writing directly to AIBS Meetings Department, 3900
Wisconsin Avenue, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20016.
Ten participating societies, including the American Fern Society, Ecological
Society of America, Mycological Society, Phycological Society, and the Torrey
Botanical Club, will have programs during the meeting. The local representative
for the Botanical Socciety is Dr. David Bierhorst, Department of Botany, University
of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. 01002.
A pre-conference symposium entitled "Current Thought in Plant Ecology", sponsored
by the Committee on Education of the Botanical Society, will be held on June
17, and details of this meeting are given elsewhere in PSB. A special post-conference
symposium entitled "Physiological Adaptation to the Environment" will be sponsored
by AIRS June 20-22.
To all the new members of BSA, we extend a special invitation to come to
the annual meeting and participate in the program.
Welcome to 1,600 New Members!
Last fall a special membership drive was launched to attract all those botanists
and botanical-types who should be members of the Botanical Society of America.
The Membership Committee, composed of Drs. Kenton Chambers, Nels Lersten,
Michael Schneider, and A. J. Sharp, chairman, did their job beyond all expectations—our
Treasurer, Dr. Ritchie Bell, was non-plussed! (Usually he is very plussed!)
As a result of their efforts we now have over 1,600 new members, and our total
membership is approaching the 5,000 mark. Special thanks goes to the Membership
Committee, and a special welcome to all our new members! If you are new to
the Society, we want to invite you to participate in the annual meeting this
year at the University of Massachusetts, June 17-22. Further announcements
will be made in Bioscience.
Current Thought in Plant Ecology
The Committee on Education of the Botanical Society is once again planning
to sponsor a pre-convention symposium for undergraduate instructors, in conjunction
with the AIRS meetings. This year the topic will be Current Thought in Plant
Ecology. David Gates, will be discussing energy exchange, Elroy Rice, will
consider plant allelopathy, Richard Ford, will consider ethnobotany, and Timothy
Allen will describe his application of systems analysis.
Sunday, June 17, 1973
9-10:15 a.m. Biophysical Ecology - The Analytical Science. David M. Gates,
Director, Biological Station, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan,
48104. 10:45-12 Noon. Allelopathy and Its Importance in Ecology. Elroy L.
Rice. Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman,
1:15-2:30 p.m. Multivariate Analyses of the Structure and Dynamics of Algal
Communities. Timothy F. Allen, Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706.
2:45-4:00 p.m. Ethnobotany and Ecology: A Synthesis. Richard I. ford, Departments
of Anthropology and Botany, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104.
Some of our readers will note that PSB no longer carries the column entitled
"Professional Opportunities". The Minutes of the Business Meeting, published
in this issue, reflect the decision of the Council to publish notices of 'positions
open' in the American Journal of Botany. This will make it possible for information
of this kind to reach the membership more rapidly than through the pages of
the quarterly PS13. Dr. Ian Sussex will edit the announcements to be published
in A.JB, and anyone wishing to invite applications from botanists should correspond
directly with Dr. Sussex, Dept. of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
This issue of PSB contains a number of articles that have to do with educational
matters as they affect botany. The Teaching Section, BSA, is one of our more
active groups, and I am pleased to be able to publish some of the papers that
were presented in their recent symposium. In the Opinion/Commentary column,
Dr. Donald Kaplan argues cogently for a new direction in the teaching of plant
morphology. Promoting good botanical teaching is still one of the important
responsibilities of BSA. Whether one considers himself primarily a "researcher"
or "teacher", we all should have an interest in the training of our successors.
JUNE 23-30, 1975
The Closing Plenary Session of the XI International Botanical Congress held
at Seattle, U.S.A., in 1969, accepted an invitation issued by the Academy
of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. to convene the XII International Botanical Congress
in the City of Leningrad in 1975. In 1971 the Organizing Committee was appointed:
consisting of a chairman (A. L. Takhtajan); four vice-chairmen (A. A. Prokofier.
.4, .4. Theodorot', N. V. Tsitsin, A. A. Yatsenko-Khmelenskv); a secretary-general
(0, V. Zalensky); a scientific secretary (N. S.Snigiereskava); and a number
of members at large. The XII International Botanical Congress is intended
to facilitate interdisciplinary communication among botanists as well as an
informal ex-change of ideas. A number of sections are planned, including special
ones to accommodate mycologists (also lichenologists), phycologists, and bryologists.
The Congress will be divided between organized half-day symposia and half-day
contributed paper sessions. In addition to the opening and closing plenary
sessions, two evening lectures are being scheduled. All special interest groups
wishing to apply for space and time during the Congress should do so by writing
as soon as possible to the secretary-general, Dr. Oleg Zalenshv, Komarov Botanical
Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., 2, Prof. Popov Street,
Leningrad 197022, U.S.S.R.
The sessions of the Nomenclature Section will take place, as usual, immediately
before the opening of the Congress—in this instance June 20-23. Four
days are set aside in order to enable the Section to convene for six to eight
sessions of two to four hours each.
A meeting of the International Association of Botanic Gardens (President
Acadmieian N. V. Tsitsin) will be held in Moscow at the Main Botanical Garden
of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. on June 20.
A tentative schedule of scientific field trips has been planned for the immediate
pre-Congress and post-Congress periods. The principle purpose of these trips
is to acquaint visiting botanists with as many interesting and unique features
of the flora and vegetation of various regions of the U.S.S.R. as possible.
Some specialized trips for phycologists, Iichenologists, bryologists, and
palaeobotanists are also planned.
The double postcards announcing the XII International Botanical Congress
were mailed during the last months of 1972. Those who wish to receive further
in-formation on the Congress should return their interest cards by April 1,
1973, so that they will be placed on the mailing list for the First Information
Circular expected to be published June-July 1973.
A. Takhtajan Chairman, Organizing Committee
FIELD MEETING OF THE NORTH-EASTERN SECTION of the American Botanical Society
will be held at University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, June 10th - 13th,
197:3. Those interested please contact Miss Mathilde P. Weinga.rtner, Staten
Island Museum, 75 Stuyvesant Pl. Staten Island, New York, 10301.
THE FIRST LATIN AMERICAN BOTANICAL CONGRESS was held in Mexico City, from
December :3 to December 9, 1972. About 500 delegates were present, including
representatives from Mexico, and most of the Central American and South American
countries. About 30 botanists from the United States also participated. In
conjunction with these meetings, the Botanical Society of Mexico celebrated
its 5th Congress, and delegates to the larger meeting were invited to a special
formal session of the Society, at which time medals for botanical merit were
awarded to three botanists who had made special contributions toward Mexican
botany. Two of these were Mexicans: Jug. Efraim Hernandez X. and Dr. Jerzy
Rzedowshi. The third was Ida K. Longman, of Philadelphia, honored for her
compilation, "A Selected Guide to the Literature on the Flowering Plants of
Mexico", published at the close of 19(34, by the University of Pennsylvania
The work was begun at the suggestion of Dr. John M. Fogg, Jr. (now director
of the Barnes Arboretum). Sup-port was provided over a number of years by
the University of Pennsylvania (with Dr. Datid Goddard as head of the Department
of Botany), by the Morris Arboretum of the University, by the American Philosophocal
Society and by the National Science Foundation. In 1965, the Guide was selected
by the Reference Service Division of the American Library Association, for
the Oberly Memorial Award Citation, as the "best bibliography submitted in
the field of agriculture or the related sciences", in 1963-1964.
Ms. Langman is at present doing bibliographic research for the Hunt Institute
for Botanical Documentation of the Carnegie-Mellon University-, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. The bibliography, published originally for $25, is now available
from the Morris Arboretum, 9414 Meadowbrook Lane, Phila., Pa. 1.91113, at
half price to inrfi-t~iduals.
THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY will
be meeting at the University of Colorado, Boulder, 4-12 August 1973. The Program
Committee has called for Contributed Papers to be submitted to Dr. Paul D.
Hurd, Jr. or Dr. Billie L. Turner, in care of the Department of Entomology,
Smithosnian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560.
Those interested in presenting a paper are urged to obtain the necessary
forms by writing Dr. James L. Reveal, Secretary. I)epartmnent of' Botany,
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
SLIDE SET SHOWING EFFECTS OF AIR POLLUTION ON PLANTS AVAILABLE. A series
of 105 35mm color slides illustrating the effects of' air pollution on plant
life is now available from the U. S. Department of Agriculture. The slides
were prepared to meet an in-creased need for accurate diagnosis or identification
or air pollutants on different kinds of plants. The series illustrates damage
done to vegetables and fruits, field crops, and ornamental plants and trees.
Some examples compare plants grown in filtered air to those grown in normal
air. Others show close-ups of leaves and fruit suffering oxidant or other
The set of 105 frames titled "The Effects of Air Pollution on Plant Life,
A-48," is broken into three sub-sets which can be purchased individually for
$13.00. They can be ordered from Photography Division, Office of In-formation,
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. 0.20250.
THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA announces eight graduate courses in biology to
be offered at the Mountain Lake Biological Station this summer. They are as
follows: First Term: June 14 - July 17: Plant Taxonomy, Mr. Lytton Musselman,
University of North Carolina; Plant Ecology: Mr. Gary Miller, Eisenhower College;
Ornithology: Mr. David W Johnston, University of Florida; Experimental Morphogenesis:
Mr. James N. Dent, University of Virginia.
Second Term: July 19 - August 21: Plant Biosystematics: Mr. C. Ritchie Bell,
University of North Carolina; Entomology: Mr. George Byers, University of
Kansas; Principles of Parasitism: Mr. G. B. Solomon, University of Pennsylvania;
Comparative Endocrinology: Mr. B. E. Frye, University of Michigan.
Fellowships of $150 for one student in each term have been made available
by the North Carolina Botanical Garden. This fellowship may not be held con-currently
with any other stipend from the Station. The recipients of these awards are
chosen by the Research and Awards Committee of the Department of Biology.
Application for awards should be sent to the Director, Mountain Lake Biological
Station, University of Virginia, Gilmer Hall, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903.
THE NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS will convene September
11-18, 1974, at the Warsaw Polytechnical University, Poland.
Preliminary meetings, including meetings of the Executive Committee, the
Council, and the Sections and Committees of the International Society for
Horticultural Science /ISHS/, will take place on September 8, 9, and 10. Registration
will be on September 10.
Those wishing further information should write to: XIX International Horticultural
Congress, Warszawa, Pkin p. 202 Poland.
NOMINATIONS ARE REQUESTED for the recipient of the Darbaker Prize awarded
annually by the Botanical Society of America. Requirements are outstanding
publications in phycology especially over the last two years. Nominations
should accompany a set of reprints and be submitted to Bruce C. Parker, Darbaker
Prize Committee, Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
A COURSE ON METHODS AND APPLICATIONS OF PLANT CELL AND TISSUE CULTURE will
be offered by the Tissue Culture Association from August 6-17, 1973, at the
W. Alton Jones Cell Science Centre under the direction of Dr. India K. Vasil
(University of Florida). Some of the leading workers in plant tissue culture
from Canada and the United States will participate in the teaching of the
course. As in the past, participants from outside the United States will be
welcome. For further details and application forms write to: Director, W.
Alton Jones Cell Science Centre, P. O. Box 631, Lake Placid, New York 12949.
THE TEACHING SECTION OF THE BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA will not have invited
papers at the up-coming A.I.B.S. meeting, but will have a special symposium
designed with the express purpose of giving those who attend the stimulus
and direction to add new zest to their teaching. The topic TEACHING WITH ALGAE
has been chosen with the idea that algae offer so much opportunity for inquiry-oriented
teaching. The complete symposium program will be published in the AIBS program.
A SYMPOSIUM, THE BASES OF ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY, will be presented at the
AIBS meetings, June 17-22. Organized by Dr. James W. Walker, this symposium
will be a discussion of the characters and fields that are the bases of Angiosperm
phylogeny at the higher taxonomic levels, related to the Takhtajan-Cronquist
system of classification. Participants will include Arthur Cronquist, Richard
Eyde, Leo Hickey, Jack Wolfe, William Dickison, Barbara Falser, H. D. Behnke,
James Doyle, Peter Raven, David Fairbrothers, T. J. Mabry, Ronald Scogin,
B. L. Turner, Virginia Page, and G. L. Stebbins.
THE CLAUDE E. O'NEAL MEMORIAL LECTURESHIP has been established at Ohio Wesleyan
University, Delaware, Ohio to honor the contribution made by the late Professor
O'Neal to the teaching of botany. Former students and friends are invited
to con-tribute to the Endowment Fund c/o Robert A. Stones, Vice President
for University Relations, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio 43015.
The committee responsible for the Lectureship is Dr. Aaron J. Sharp, Dr. C.
Gardner Shaw, and Dr. Robert W. Long.
BASIC MECHANISMS IN PLANT MORPHOGENESIS, BROOKHAVEN SYMPOSIUM IN BIOLOGY
NO. 25, will be held June 4-6, 1973. The topics will be divided into requential
sessions: (1) Morphogenesis in lower forms; (2) Factors affecting Morphogensis;
(3) Cellular factors affecting Morphogenesis; (4) The Genetics of Morphogensis
I; The Genetics of Morphogenesis, II. Special lectures will be presented by
Dr. Ian Sussex and Dr. G. L. Stebbins. Those desiring further information
should write to: Dr. Peter S. Carlson, Biology Department, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973.
Dr. Philip H. Abelson, President of the Carnegie Institution of Washington;
announced today the appointment of Dr. Winslow R. Briggs as Director of the
Institution's Department of Plant Biology in Stanford, California. The appointment
is effective July 1, 1973. Dr. Briggs will succeed Dr. C. Stacy French, who
will retire after serving as Director since 1947.
Dr. Briggs was a member of the Department of Biological Sciences at Stanford
University from 1955 until 1967, when he joined the faculty at Harvard.
BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC.
OFFICERS FOR 1973
PRESIDENT: *Arthur Cronquist
New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458
VICE-PRESIDENT: "Theodore Delevoryas Department of Botany
University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712
SECRETARY: *Barbara F. Palser (1970-1974)
Department of Botany Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
TREASURER: *C. Ritchie Bell (1973-1977)
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill,
North Carolina 27514
PROGRAM DIRECTOR: *Augustus E. DeMaggio (1973-1975)
Department of Biological Sciences
Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE: Ernest A. Ball (1971-1973)
Dept. of Developmental and Cell Biology
University of California Irvine, California 92664
David W. Bierhorst (1972-1974)
Department of Botany University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
John G. Torrey (1973-1975) Harvard Forest
Harvard University Petersham, Massachusetts 01366
EDITOR, *Norman H. Boke (1970-1974)
AMERICAN Department of Botany and
JOURNAL OF BOTANY and Microbiology 770 Van Vleet Oval University
of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73069
EDITOR, PLANT *Robert W. Long
SCIENCE BULLETIN: (1971-1975)
Department of Biology University of South Florida Tampa, Florida :33620
BUSINESS MANAGER, *Richard A. Popham
AMERICAN Department of Botany
JOURNAL OF BOTANY: Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio
Sectional Officers and Council Members
PAST PRESIDENT, 1972: *Charles Heimsch Department of Botany
Oxford, Ohio 45056
PAST PRESIDENT, 1971: *Richard C. Starr Department of Botany
Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47401
PAST PRESIDENT, 1970: *Lincoln Constance Department of Botany
University of California Berkeley, California 94720
Chairman (197,3-1975): *Richard M. Klein Department of Botany
University of Vermont Burlington, Vermont 05401
Vice-Chairman (197:3-1975): Donald E. Fosket Dept. of Developmental
and Cell Biology
University of California Irvine, California 92664
Secretary (197:3-1975): Jane Taylor
Biology Department University of Michigan Flint, Michigan 48503
Representative to AJB Knut J. Norstog
Editorial Board (1971-1973): Department of Biological Sciences
Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois 60115
Chairman (1971-1973): *Graeme P. Berlyn School of Forestry Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut 06511
Representative to AJB Arthur W. Galston
Editorial Board (indefinite): Department of Biology Yale
New Haven, Connecticut 06520
Chairman (1973): *Jerry McClure Department of Botany Miami
Oxford, Ohio 45056
Vice-Chairman (1973): Yaakov Shechter Department of Biology
Bronx, New York 10468
Secretary (1973-1974): David E. Giannasi
New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458
Representative to AJB Tod F. Stuessy
Editorial Board (1971-197:3): Academic Faculty of Botany
Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210
Chairman (1973): E. Mark Engleman Departmento de Botanica
Chapingo, Edo de Mexico Mexico
Vice-Chairman (1973): Natalie W. Uhl Bailey Hortorium
467 Mann Library
Ithaca, New York 14850
Secretary-Treasurer *Donald R. Kaplan
(1973): Department of Botany University of California Berkeley, California
Representative to AJB William F. Millington
Editorial Board (1972-1974): Department of Biology Marquette
University Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
Chairman (1972-1973): Jerry W. Stannard Department of History
University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66044
Vice-Chairman (1972-1973): Harriet B. Creighton Department
of Biology Wellesley College
Wellesley, Massachusetts 02181
Secretary (1971-1973): *Ronald L. Stuckey Department of
Botany 1735 Neil Avenue
Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210
Representative to AJB Emanuel D. Rudolph
Editorial Board (1973-1975): Department of Botany 1735 Neil
Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210
Chairman (1973): Jerome M. Aronson Department of Botany
Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85281
Vice-Chairman (1973): James S. Lovett Department of Biological
West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Secretary (1972-1974): Charles E. Bracker Dept. of Botany
Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Representative to the Council *Ian K. Ross
(1973-1975): Department of Biological Sciences
University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106
Representative to AJB Peter R. Day
Editorial Board (1973-1975): Department of Genetics Connecticut Agricultural
New Haven, Connecticut 06504
Chairman (1972-1973): Ben M. Stidd Department of Biology
Western Illinois University Macomb, Illinois 61455
Secretary-Treasurer *Thomas N. Taylor
(1972-1974): Department of Botany Ohio University Athens,
Representative to AJB J. William Schopf
Editorial Board (1972-1973): Department of Geology University
Los Angeles, California 90024
Chairman (1972-1973): *Michael J. Wynne Department of Botany
University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712
Secretary (1972-1974): Paul J. Biebel
Department of Biology Dickinson College
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17103
Representative to AJB George F. Papenfuss
Editorial Board (1970-1973): Department of Botany University of California
Berkeley, California 94720
Chairman (1972-1973): David W. Bierhorst Department of Botany
University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
Secretary-Treasurer *Edward J. Klekowski
(1972-1974): Department of Botany University of Massachusetts
Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
Representative to AJB Rolla Tryon
Editorial Board (1971-1973): Gray Herbarium
22 Divinity Avenue Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Chairman (1972-1973): *Carroll E. Wood, Jr. Arnold Arboretum
22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Secretary (1972-1974): Duncan M. Porter Department of Botany
Smithsonian Institution Washington, D. C. 20560
Representative to AJB Patricia K. Holmgren Editorial Board
(1973-1975): New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458
Chairman (1973): Sanford S. Tepfer Department of Biology
University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403
Vice-Chairman (1973): Donald Dean
Department of Biology Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio 44017
Secretary (1971-1973): *Elwood B. Ehrle
School of Arts and Sciences Mankato State College Mankato, Minnesota 56001
Representative to AJB Robert W. Hoshaw
Editorial Board (1969-1973): Botanical Laboratories Agricultural
University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721
Chairman (1973): LeRoy K. Henry Carnegie Museum Pittsburgh,
Secretary-Treasurer *Matilde P. Weingartner
(1973-1975): Staten Island Museum 75 Stuyvesant Place
Staten Island, New York 10301
Chairman (1972-1973): W. M. Laetsch Department of Botany
University of California Berkeley, Californa 94720
Vice-Chairman (1972-1973): George C. Carroll Department
of Biology University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403
Secretary-Treasurer *Joseph Arditti
(1971-1973): Dept. of Developmental and Cell Biology
University of California Irvine, California 92664
AAAS Council Leo E. Jones
Representative Botany Department Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Chairman (1971-1973): Ray Noggle
Department of Botany North Carolina State University
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Secretary-Treasurer *Dana Griffin III
(1971-1974): Department of Botany University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida 32601
Chairman of Activities John A. Boole, Jr.
Committee (1973): Division of Science and Mathematics
Georgia Southern College Statesboro, Georgia 30458
*Persons so marked are members of the Council. BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA,
COMMITTEES - 1.973
The inidividuals listed as chairmen serve in that office for 1973. In parentheses
following each name is the date of expiration of that individual's appointment
to the committee.
Chairman's Addre,,, Committee on Corresponding Members
Charles Heimsch (1975), Department of Botany
Chairman Miami University
Richard C. Starr (1974) Oxford, Ohio 45056 Lincoln Constance
Merit Awards Committee
Albert C. Smith (1973) Department of Botany
Chairman University of Massachusetts
W. Dwight Billings (1973) Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 G.
F. Papenfuss (1974)
Henry N. Andrews, Jr. (1975)
Arthur Galston (1975)
Ex officio: President
Darbaher Prize Committee
Bruce C. Parker (1973) Department of Biology
Chairman 3025 Derring Hall
Norma J. Lang (1974) Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Michael Neushul (1975) Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
New York Botanical Garden Award Committee
William F. Millington Department of Biology
(197:3), Chairman Marquette University
Everett S. Beneke (1973) Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 John
W. Hall (1973)
Eldon H. Newcomb (1973)
Jeanette Siron Pelton Award Committee
Edward C. Cantino (1973), Dept. of Botany &
Chairman Plant Pathology
Claud L. Brown (1974 Michigan State University
James A. Lockhart (1974) East Lansing, Michigan 4882:3 D.
G. de Torok (1973)
Kenton L. Chambers (1973), Botany Department
Chairman Oregon State University
Lawrence Bogorad (1974) Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Patricia
L. Walne (1975)
Knut J. Norstog (1976)
Ex officio: Secretary
Peter Kaufman (1973), Department of Botany
Chairman University of Michigan Nicholas C. Maravolo (197:3)
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 J. Donald LaCroix (1974)
Paul C. MacMillan (1974)
Fred R. Rickson (1975)
Willard W. Payne (1975)
Ex officio: President, Secretary, Secretary of Teaching Section, Editor of
Plant Science Bulletin, Representative to AAAS Cooperative Committee on the
Teaching of Science and Mathematics, Past Chairman of Committee
Elsie Quarterman Box 1616 Station B
(1973), Chairman Vanderbilt University
William A. Niering (1973) Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Catherine
Edward E. Clebsch (1974)
Carl D. Monk (1974)
Roger E. Wilson (1974)
Committee on Research Funding
William A. Jensen, Department of Botany
Chairman University of California
Loran C. Anderson Berkeley, California 94720 Melvin S. Fuller
Ian M. Sussex
Francis R. Trainor
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS OR COMMITTEES
W. Gordon Whaley (1974) A. Orville Dahl (1975)
AIRS 'Ioverning Board Roy L. Taylor (1974
AAAS Cooperative Committee on the Teaching of Science and Mathematics Robert
W. Hoshaw (1973)
Division of Biology and Agriculture, National Research Council William L.
Minutes of the Business Meeting
Botanical Society of America
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 30, 1972
The meeting was called to order by Vice-President Warren H. Wagner, Jr.
at 1:02 P.M. in Room 45 of Nicholson Hall. The 41 members present at the
beginning of the meeting, later increased to about 60, constituted a quorum.
The minutes of the Business Meeting of 1971, as published in the Plant
Science Bulletin, were approved.
. In the absence of the Chairman of the Elections Committee, Dr. Walter Tulecke,
the Secretary presented the names of the newly elected officers for 1973.
President: Arthur Cronquist, New York Botanical Garden Vice-President: Theodore
Delevoryas, University of Texas Treasurer: C. Richie Bell, University of North
Carolina Program Director: Augustus E. DeMaggio, Dartmouth
Member of the Editorial Board, American Journal of Botany: John G. Torrey,
The Secretary continues in office for 1973.
4. The following amendment of the By-Laws, approved by the Council in June,
1971 and submitted in writing to the membership, was brought up for action.
"Article IV, 3. Procedures for the election of the Editor-in-Chief and appointment
of the Business Manager of the American Journal of Botany are provided for
in Article VII.
Selection of the Editor of the Plant Science Bulletin shall be the responsibility
of the Executive Committee of the Council: Approximately one year before
the completion of the incumbent Editor's five-year term or at any other
time when a vacancy of this office is imminent or actual, the President
shall appoint a committee, ordinarily consisting of the incumbent Editor
as Chairman and three other members; at least one, but not more than two,
of these three other members shall he current members of the Editorial
Board of the Plant Science Bulletin. Confirmation of the candidate selected
by this committee by the Executive Committee of the Council shall be required.
A Plant Science Bulletin. Editorial Board of five members shall he appointed
by the President upon recommendation of the incumbent Editor. The period
of service shall be five years with staggered terms. In the event of resignation
prior to the end of a board member's full term, the President, in consultation
with the Editor, shall appoint a replacement for the time remaining in
the term involved. No one shall be appointed for two consecutive full
Approval of the amendment was moved, seconded, and passed unanimously.
The Secretary reported on three Society publications which have appeared
since the last Business Meeting. "The Guide to Graduate Study in Botany"
appeared in early fall 1971. It gives information about departments in
the U. S. and Canada offering a Ph.D. in some aspect of plant science.
It is available from the Secretary's office for $3. The career booklet,
"Botany as a Profession", was updated during the winter by a subcommittee
of the Education Committee. Approximately 3,000 copies have already been
mailed out in response to requests. The "Yearbook" for 1971-1972 appeared
late in 1971. It returned to the format requested by the membership last
year. For the next issue of the "Yearbook", which will be published next
year, the Council has authorized some changes. By-Laws of the Society
and Sections will be printed separately and will not be repeated in each
"Year-book". Reports and minutes will be published in the Plant Science
Bulletin and eliminated from the "Yearbook". The present format of the
membership list and geographical index will be retained, but will be printed
by a cheaper and more rapid method.
Dr. Richard Starr, Chairman of the Committee on Corresponding Members,
presented the committee's recommendations, already approved by the Council.
Arturo Erardo Burkart, Director of the Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
in Argentina; Gunnar Erdtman, Palynologiska Laboratoriet of Stockholm
University, Sweden; Albert George Long, Deputy Curator of Hancock Museum,
University of Newcastle-on-Tyne, England; and William Raymond Philipson,
Professor of Botany at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand were
proposed for membership and unanimously elected. This raises the total
number of living corresponding members to 50, the limit set by the By-Laws.
Dr. Theodore Delevoryas, Treasurer, reported on membership figures, which
have shown a steady decrease during the past three years. He also presented
three financial reports: the final report for 1971, which will be published
in the Plant Science Bulletin, the projected report for 1972, and the
proposed budget for 1973. At present the Society is in fairly healthy
condition, particularly since the Journal has not needed funds from the
Since the Society and Journal are in no financial difficulties, it was
moved, seconded, and passed unanimously that the dues for 1973 remain
at the present level:
Regular - $10 Retired subscribing - $5
Family - $12 Life - $250 Student - $6
A drive for increased membership will be mounted this fall. The committee
responsible for this consists of Kenton Chambers, Nels Lersten, Michael
Schneider, and A. J. Sharp as Chair-man. Dr. Sharp reported on various
projects that have already been planned and indicated that the Council
had additionally suggested that all new regular and student memberships
for 1973 received by December 31, 1972 he admitted at half the stipulated
Dr. Lawrence Crockett, Business Manager of the American Journal of Botany
had left Minnesota before the Business Meeting, but his final report for
1971 and proposed budget for 1973 were presented by Dr. Delevoryas. These
show that the Journal finished the year 1971 almost $14,000 in the black
and that, even with the increase in pages authorized by the Council, the
Journal probably will not need but about one-third of the funds set aside
for the Journal in the Society budget. Dr. Greenfield moved that Dr. Crockett's
report be approved and that we extend our very hearty thanks to him for
his long and devoted service to the Society. This was seconded and passed
unanimously. In this regard a resolution passed by the Council was read
by Dr. Boke: "Dr. Lawrence J. Crockett, who assumed the Business Managership
of the American Journal of Botany in 1960, is resigning his position as
of the end of this year. Dr. Crockett has kept the Journal on a sound
financial basis in spite of many difficulties, and he has supervised the
transfer of printing operations to Lawrence. Kansas with consummate skill.
The Council therefore wishes to express its deep appreciation to him for
extraordinary services rendered during his 12-year incumbency."
Dr. Wagner announced that the new Business Manager, appointed to take
Dr. Crockett's place, is Dr. Richard A. Popham.
Dr. Norman Boke, Editor of the American Journal of Botany, presented
some statistics about numbers of papers, times between receipt and appearance
in print, etc. for the past year. The length of time elapsing has been
increasing because of an in-crease in the backlog of manuscripts.
Dr. Wagner reported that the Council had authorized the printing of job openings,
such as have appeared in Plant Science Bulletin this past year, on the back
cover of the Journal for a one-year trial period. Dr. Ian Sussex will edit
Dr. Wagner reported that the Council had authorized Dr. Robert Long,
Editor, to increase the number of pages in the Plant Science Bulletin
if the amount of material on hand warrants it. Dr. Long had reported that
he had a considerable backlog of reviews. Dr. Long had not been reviewing
texts, but a number of people on the Council had felt that this would
be a useful service. Dr. Adolph Hecht spoke against this, saying that
there are so many texts that is would be difficult either to review them
all or to make a selection of which to review. He felt that the Editor
should be allowed to decide what types of books should or should not be
The Program Director, Dr. Samuel Postlethwait, reported briefly on this
year's program, referring particularly to the all-Society symposium in
honor of the 25th anniversary of AIBS. He also indicated that, because
of the success of last year's meeting with the Canadians, we have been
approached about joining with them again. At present we have planned to
meet with AIBS at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, June 17-22,
1973 and again at Arizona State University in Tempe, dune 16-21, 1974.
For the latter meetings the Mexican and Central American botanists will
be contacted — and the Canadians urged to join us to make a meeting
of all American botanists.
A suggestion made to the Council that all-Society symposia be continued has
been passed on to the new Program Director for consideration. The suggestion
was that such symposia be aimed at educating members of federal agencies,
science writers, biology teachers, etc. as well as professional botanists
to the importance of plant sciences in the world today.
A suggestion was made by Dr. Sydney Greenfield that the Society consider
a special program for 1976, the 200th anniversary of our country, perhaps
centered around something such as the contributions of botany to the growth
of the U. S. during its 200 years.
Dr. Postlethwait moved the following resolution which passed unanimously:
"The Botanical Society wishes to express its gratitude to the administrative
officers of both the University of Minnesota and the American Institute of
Biological Sciences and to their local representative, Dr. John W. Hall, for
the excellent arrangements and facilities provided for the 1972 meetings."
Dr. Richard Starr, who has served on the Council for the past several
years, presented a resolution expressing the hearty thanks of the Society
to Dr. Delevoryas who has worked hard as Treasurer for 5 years and to
Dr. Postlethwait who has struggled with the meeting program for ;3 years.
The resolution was enthusiastically endorsed.
Dr. Adolph Hecht presented the following resolution: "To Charles Heimsch,
President, Botanical Society of America. We regret that you were unable
to attend our sessions in Minneapolis. We extend our best wishes for Mrs.
Heimsch' speedy and full recovery. Warren H. Wagner, Jr., Vice-President,
for the Council and membership of the Botanical Society in attendance
at the annual business meeting." The resolution passed unanimously
Dr. Nels Lersten asked if the Council had taken any action concerning
abstracts of papers presented at the meetings. Dr. Wagner replied that
Council discussion had led to the decision to continue the publication
of abstracts, but to handle them differently — by photo-offset of
the abstracts as submitted by the authors rather than by printing in the
American Journal of Botany. This will decrease expense and probably allow
us to have a somewhat later deadline for abstracts.
Dr. William Jensen asked if and what the Society was doing about getting
more support for research in the plant sciences. Dr. Wagner referred to
the Plant Science Research Committee, in which the Botanical Society will
be represented, and Dr. Bell commented briefly on plans of the AIBS Governing
Board in this direction. Dr. Bell pointed out that since an organization
the size of AIBS can carry considerably more weight and have much more
effect than an organization the size of the Botanical Society, he felt
that we should strongly support AIBS in its efforts to gain more recognition
and support for biological research. Dr. Greenfield was not in favor of
support of AIBS, but would like the Society to take the lead in coordinating
all the plant science societies.
Dr. Jensen pointed out that there are two Lev-As. Something needs to be done
for biology in general, and this is the spot for AIBS which he feels we should
support strongly, but as we are also botanists and there are problems specific
to the plant sciences, we need to attack the latter aspect ourselves. Since
at present we really do not have specific facts, Dr. Jensen moved that the
President appoint a Committee to get the facts about the status of funding
of plant research and, armed with the facts, explore ways and means of improving
the situation. The motion was seconded. During the discussion it was pointed
out that the Committee, or members of it, could well act as liaison between
the Society and both the Plant Science Research Committee and AIBS committees
acting in this area of endeavor. The motion passed unanimously.
Dr. ,Jensen also moved that the Botanical Society express its support of
AIBS in its efforts to obtain recognition of biology and increased funding
of biological research by federal agencies. The motion passed.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, Barbara F. Palser, Secretary
Citations for Awards Presented at the Annual Banquet, 1972
Darbaker Prize (This award is made for meritorious work in the study of microscopical
To Michael Neushul of the University of California in Santa Barbara
"his breadth of research interest from the sub-microscopic level of thylakoid
structure and function to the macroscopic level of growth characteristics
of kelp is very unusual and his use of the double-fracture technique in freeze-etching
and electron microscopy of red algal thylakoids has provided the most definitive
information to date on an extensively debated topic."
Merit Award (This award is made to persons judged to have made outstanding
contributions to botanical science.)
To Aaron J. Sharp of the University of Tennessee
"bryololgist, plant geographer; he has demonstrated the floristic relationships
between North America and Asia from the Arctic to the Tropics. An outstanding
and enthusiastic teacher, he has inspired and guided many who have become
To Frank Harlan Lewis of the University of California at Los Angeles
"eminent evolutionary biologist, teacher, and administrator; his studies
of chromosome behavior in such genera as Clurhia, Mentzelia, Delphinium, and
their relatives have provided the cytotaxonomic basis for his brilliant generalizations
as to population dynamics, the processes of speciat.ion, and the nature of
To Charles B. Heiser, Jr. of Indiana University
"Scholarly student of the systematics and evolution of vascular plants; his
original and significant contributions through extended studies of Compositae
Solanaceae have utilized many techniques; his interest in the origins of
cultivated plants and weeds has led to a new appreciation of such plants as
materials for important evolutionary studies."
New York Botanical Garden Award (The N. Y. Botanical Garden presents an award
to the author of a recent publication making an outstanding contribution to
the fundamental aspects of botany.)
To Daniel I. Axelrod of the University of California at Davis
"for his numerous and outstanding and pioneering contributions to the paleogeography
and early evolution of the angiosperms; his contributions and original ideas
have stimulated world-wide research and added to fundamental botanical knowledge.
Of a number of recent articles, his paper in the 1970 volume of Botanical
Review entitled "Mesozoic paleogeography and early angiosperm history" is
cited in particular."
Jeanette Siron Pelton Award (This award is awarded from time to time to young
investigators in recognition of exceptionally imaginative contributions in
the field of experimental plant morphology. It carries with it a premium of
To Paul B. Green of Stanford University
"for his investigations into problems of growth in the alga Nitella which
have revealed the role of cytoplasmic elements in development and focused
attention on the unique properties of the plant cell wall. Perhaps the most
notable of his scientific achievements has been the application of physical
principles to problems of plant morphogenesis.
Paleobotanical Award (This award is presented on an annual basis for the
outstanding contributed paper within the Paleobotanical Section, Botanical
Society of America. The recipient is determined by a committee designated
by the current section chairman.)
This year's award is presented to William L. Crepet,
University of Texas, for his outstanding contribution
titled "Pollination in Cycadeoidea".
Jesse M. Greenman Award (of the Missouri Botanical Garden Alumni Association
for the best thesis in plant systematics during the previous year [1971-72].)
To William T. Gillis
"The systematics and ecology of poison-ivy and the poison-oaks (Toxicodendron,
Botanical Society of America 1972
Arturo Erardo Burkart, Director of the Instituto de Botanica DARWINION since
1936 and a professor at various times at both the University of La Plata and
the University of Buenos Aires, is a senior member of Argentina's group of
distinguished botanists. He has written extensively on the systematics and
floristics of the Argentinian flora, establishing himself as the Latin American
expert on legumes and as an important contributor to the literature of agriculture
and the history of biology. As head of the DARWINION and editor of its journal
Darwiniana he has strongly influenced the favorable development of plant science
throughout South America.
Professor Gunnar Erdtman, Palynologiska Laboratoriet, Stockholm University,
Sweden, for his pioneering contributions to palynology. His monumental work
on pollen morphology has led to a comprehensive understanding of the structure,
evolutionary trends, and taxonomic significance of pollen grains and spores.
His many books and papers are indispensible both for students of pollen morphology
and those who utilize pollen and spores as a research tool; his highly developed
terminology for pollen ultrastructure is used throughout the world. In addition,
many of his earlier works were responsible for the rapid development of pollen
analysis as a paleoecological research method.
Albert George Long, Deputy Curator, Hancock Museum, University of Newcastle-on-Tyne,
England for his patient, prolonged, continuous search through the Lower Carboniferous
strata of Berwickshire for petrified specimens of early seed plants. The reward
for his search has been an understanding of the structure of a wide range
of primitive seeds thereby providing firm data for what had been only hypotheses
of the origin of seeds. Long's success in bridging this gap between pteridophytes
and seed plants must be place alongside Kidston and Lang's discovery of Rhynia
and Florin's elucidation of the evolution of conifer cones in a list of the
landmarks in the study of evolution in plants.
William Raymond Philipson, Professor of Botany, University of Canterbury,
New Zealand, for his important contributions to interpretive morphology, floristics,
developmental anatomy, and systematics. He is a recognized authority on the
structure and classification of Pacific Araliaceae and on the primary and
secondary vascular tissues of angiosperms in general. In addition, he is an
occasional contributor to horticultural journals, and his activities as a
field naturalist have resulted in five books for general readership.
ROMAGNESI, HENRI, ed. Exotic Mushrooms. Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. 1971.
192 pp, 160 color plates. $12.95.
An exotic coffee table deserves to be topped by this illustrative mushroom
book, not the kitchen or laboratory desk where it might fall into use although
certainly not for long!
The editor introduces the book with brief sections of diverse quality. For
example, in "Types of Mushrooms" he interestingly describes for a lay population
these organisms in relation to other fungi and creatures. However, the segment,
"The Mushrooms Role in the Life Cycle" leads the reader completely into "Wonderland!"
In another portion of the text "Edible Mushrooms" the nutritional value of
these fruiting bodies is presented and some of this discussion is curiously
misleading, such as the following:
"even so, mushrooms often prove heavy and difficult to digest well, and doctors
forbid them to patients suffering from liver complaints."
Perhaps the butter in which they are frequently bathed is the danger in such
The book is mainly a compilation of realistic and colorful mushroom paintings
parceled out in 160 color plates that are 81/2 inches by 11 inches. These
illustrations have been executed by several European painters among whom are
A. Lacaze and J. Chenantais
who contributed the majority of them. Included with the collection of mushroom
renditions are 18 unsealed charts in which mostly spores and cystidia are
depicted by black and white drawings. Since there is no mention in the text
of the relationship that cystidia have to mushrooms, this would seem to present
a baffling situation to the amateur.
Thus it seems that the production of this hook was not necessarily intended
to aid in identification but to illucidate the diversity of some of the agarics.
If this is not done satisfactorily by the coffee table approach, then one
can amputate the pages and frame them, paint them, stitch them, or sculpt
them. There are indeed exotic ways to use this tome!
Diane T. Wagner-Merner. Uniuer. of So. Fla.
RUNECKLES, V. C. AND J. E. WATKIN. (Editors) Vol.
1. Recent Advances in Phvlochemistrv. Appleton-
Century-Crofts, New York. 1972. 317 pp., $24.95. This volume contains a series
of papers presented at the annual symposium of the Phytochemical Society of
North America held at Banff, Alberta in 1969. The emphasis in each review
is on the biochemical aspects of the topic, but some of the authors include
a discussion of the biological significance of the compounds in metabolism
and evolution of plants.
Each of the nine chapters is devoted to a specific topic. The first chapter
by Towers and Subba Rao is a thorough review of the biosynthetic and degradative
path-ways of the versatile compounds of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and dopa.
Floss discusses the biosynthesis of fur a nocoumarins, compounds which include
physiologically active compounds, such as aflotoxins. Hanson and Havir present
the mechanism and molecular structure of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. This
enzyme catalyses the formation of cinnamic acid from phenylalanine and is
important in shunting phenylallanine and tyrosine from protein synthesis to
the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid compounds. The enzymic reduction of cinnamic
acid is discussed by Zenk and Gross. They emphasize the reduction of acids
to aldehydes and alcohols which then may be incorporated into lignin. Steelink
discusses the biological oxidation of lignin phenols.
The chapter most concerned with the biological aspects of the topic is Harborne's
presentation of the evolution and function of flavonoids in plants. He discusses
petal color, properties of taste, growth regulation and toxicity as well as
the general distribution of the flavonoids throughout the plant kingdom. Van
Sumere and his colleagues at Gent give an extensive review of the possible
regulatory roles of naturally occurring coumarins and phenolics in relation
to the germination of barley and lettuce seeds and the growth of yeast. The
deposition of lignin under various environmental conditions is discussed by
Siegel and his co-workers.
Maybry closes the volume with a short discussion of the major frontiers of
phytochemistry and touches on such topics as natural products, ultrastructure,
chemotaxonomy, phylogeny, and the genetics of secondary compounds. Perhaps
future symposia of the society will center on some of these topics. This volume
represents a concise review of significant areas of current interest in phytochemistry.
The most serious criticism of the work is the length of time from the symposium
to the publication of the papers.
Sarah Clevenger Indiana State Unit.
CADBURY, D. A., J. G. HAWKES, and R. C. READETT. A Computer-Mapped Flora
- A Study of the County of Warwickshire. Academic Press, New
York, 1971. ix + 768 pages. $31.50.
The Preface declares that, "This is a County Flora with a difference." The
difference is that the compute r was used to produce species distribution
and habitat maps and to compile selected summary statistics. This is a first
for a county flora, the authors claim.
Basically it is a thorough presentation of the flora of an English county
of 1500 square miles. Excellent introductory chapters cover the county's physiography,
geology and soils, land use history and discussion of previous floristic work.
Another presents an interesting area sampling scheme for the county (stratified,
random), which was able to reduce the work required to a manageable amount.
Locality records were then input to a computer via punched paper tape, corrected
and used as a basis to produce computer generated distribution maps, one per
species. So far this procedure follows roughly that of Perring and Walters
in their Atlas of the British Flora (1962). But the present authors do not
just indicate presence or absence of a species in a given map unit through
nine different plotting symbols they indicate the habitat of each species
in the map unit. If the species is found in more than one habitat in the same
map unit, several symbols are overprinted by the computer. In addition, two
shades of these nine symbols are used, light for rare to occasionally occurring
in the map unit, and dark for frequently to abundantly occurring within the
sampling unit. Still more information is available from each map, since like
the Atlas of the British Flora, trans-parent overlays are provided, yielding
information on relief, waterways, surface geology, etc.
The authors are correct. This is a county flora with a difference. But we
may ask whether this represents a taxonomic advance or computer-pollution.
I think it is both! As the authors suggest, we are at the dawn of a new era
in floristic work and the computer is responsible for it. Once basic distribution
data are in the computer, qualitive advances are possible in biogeography.
One out-standing example appearing in the current work is the recognition
and description of different habitats. Others will be the correlation of distributions
of species by pairs and by groups. But these and other unique results do not
require the 400 plus pages of distribution maps in the present volume. Who
does'? This is where the question of computer pollution comes in. Would it.
have been better to have deposited the computer generated maps in a Systematics
Center and produced a volume at one-third the price'? Persons interested in
maps of particular taxa could request copies of those only. In analogous ways,
with the computerization of Index Nominum Genericorum, a taxonomist can request
a printout of only those genera in families of' his interest, and not have
to purchase the entire set. Similarly, in the computerization of label data
of the 65,000 specimens of the Greene Her-barium, I have put off any large
formal publication of its contents because for the money needed to produce
it, I can provide customized computer searches and printouts for hundreds
To conclude, this volume on the Warwickshire flora is a thorough addition
to floristic study, replete with qualitative advances of technique. At the
same time it should motivate us to think.clearly about which directions future
work should go.
Theodore 1 Crot'ello University of Notre Dame
JANICK, JULES. Horticultural Science, 2nd Ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San
Francisco, Calif. 1972. x + 586 pp. $12.00.
"Horticultural Science" is a textbook designed for the beginning horticulture
student, although it may be used by all students who are interested in the
plant sciences. The author is to be complimented upon his presentation of
horticultural topics in such a manner that there is relevance between subject
matter and practical application.
This text has been divided into 3 parts which are as follows: 1) The Biology
of Horticulture; 2) The Technology of Horticulture; and :3) The Industry of
Horticulture. Topics discussed include classification of horticultural plants,
their structure, plant growth, plant development, controlling plant environment,
directing plant growth, biological competition, mechanisms of propagation,
plant improvement, marketing, horticultural geography, horticultural production
systems, horticultural crops and the esthetics and impact of horticulture.
Although there is a tremendous mass of material involved, the student will
receive an excellent introduction to the biological facts of plant production
in horticulture. However, it would have been desirable to have a more comprehensive
presentation concerning the different facets of marketing and utilization
of the various horticultural products. The chapter on horticultural crops
should be expanded to cover them in more detail, rather than leave the student
with just a passing glance at a giant industry. For example, only a few paragraphs
were devoted to the multi-million dollar industries of citrus and sweet corn.
The chapter on marketing should further illustrate the rapidly changing technology
in the various phases of horticulture.
If the selected references for all the chapters were ex-tended considerably,
it would be of great help both to instructor and to student. As the text is
presented, the student has not yet been introduced to such publications as
the Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, International
Society for Plant Propagators, American Journal of Botany, and other pertinent
research journals. An accompanying manual for laboratory experience and possible
field observations would be extremely helpful to students and staff.
Regardless of the preceding comments, I recommend this as a basic text for
an introductory course in horticulture.
R. K. Simons Unit.. of Illinois
ROBERTS, E. H. ed. Viability of Seeds. Syracuse Univ. Press. Syracuse, N.
Y. 1972. 448 pp. $20.00.
Professor Roberts has compiled the work of a number of experts from widely
separated disciplines into a well-organized treatise. "Viability of Seeds"
reads like a book rather than a series of monographs but as the author him-self
suggests, need not be read through in numerical order of chapters. The book
is comprehensive enough to be used as a reference, yet suitable for a textbook.
There are 12 chapters plus 4 informative and helpful appendices in this book
on various facets of seed viability which range from ancestry to zvmogens.
Practical in-formation for those interested in seed storage can he found (e.g.
effects of various factors during and prior to harvest, ideal storage conditions
for various seeds, pitfalls involved in seed storage, viability nomographs,
etc.) as well as the theoretical. This reviewer appreciated the wide ranging
coverage of the various authors. For example, there is an interesting section
on the effects of light on certain dormant seeds; a brief history, detective
work involved studying this phenomenon, culminating in the discovery of phytochrome.
There is a hint of teleology when phytochrome is called a "neat environment
sensing device" which prohibits germination of the seed under a leaf canopy
(far red) whereas the inhibition is released by sunlight (red). Each author
has done a credible job evaluating knowledge in his particular field, generally
with excellent bibliographies for reference.
Because the book was written by a number of authors, there are inevitable
overlapping areas, but for this very reason it has many stimulating points
of view. For instance, the problem of analyzing seed germinability has been
viewed from many angles, depending upon the worker. Examples of different
viewpoints include: analysis of germinability by observing prematurely aged
seeds; histochemical analysis through use of various stains; use of biochemical
parameters such as enzymes or intermediary metabolites; cytological analysis
suggested by the negative correlation found between germinability and chromosomal
aberrations; the statistical approach; and physiological methods of analysis,
e.g. loss of membrane integrity with decreasing viability. Also, not everyone
is concerned with enhancing longevity of seeds; weed control people would
like to shorten it. Thus, although most of the authors ha,'e tried to be as
catholic as possible in their presentations, multiple authorship presents
an even wider panorama.
This reviewer feels that "Viability of Seeds"would be a valuable addition
to the library of any worker who is interested in plants, but especially if
he is concerned with plant seeds. The widely separated areas of interests
en-compassed by seed viability have been skillfully woven into a well-knit
book that is interesting for the amateur, yet scholarly enough for the experienced
New Orleans, La.
PANKOW, HELMUI', Algen Flora der Ost.see. I. Bentos (Blau-, Grun-, Braun-,
and Rotalpen). Vet). Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena. 1971. 419 pp.
This handbook of the algal flora of the Baltic Sea is a well written, and
taxonomically up-to-date account. The text is written in modern, easy to read
German. The algal descriptions and keys to genera and species are concise,
clear and fairly easy to follow. The line drawings accompanying the various
genera throughout the book are extensive and adequate. The photographs, placed
at the back of the book are not as useful because of the poor quality of reproduction.
Dr. Pankow follows the European classification of the Cyanophyta and hence
uses Geitler's major taxonomic characters for identification and taxonomic
groups. However, Dr. Pankow does give Drouet and Daily's revision of the Chroococcaceae,
at the end of this section, indicating by synomvms how the two classifications
can be compared.
This handbook is especially impressive in the in-corporation of the modern
revisions of various genera of green, brown, and red algae. Throughout the
text Dr. Pankow included footnotes in which he discusses the taxonomic implications
of various revisions. For example, he includes Kesseler's revision of Chaetomorpha
and van den Hoek's revision of Cladophora. Thus, this work is not only relevant
as a local flora with clear, useable keys and line drawings, but also as a
source for more recent
revisions of various genera, at least for the European species.
For those of us concerned with local floras, such a text should prove useful
as a guide to clear, simple keys and drawings as well as a source for recent
taxonomic revisions not easily available.
Clinton Daises Unit'. of So. Fla.
HEUSSER, CALVIN J. Pollen and Spores of Chile. Univ. of Arizona Prss, Tucson,
Ariz. 1971. 167 pp., 60 plates. $15.00.
Though initiated as early as Humbolt's botanical explorations and observations
on the biogeography of northern South America (1799-1804) and extended by
visits of Darwin (HMS Beagle, 18:32-5) to Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego, and
the Pacific coasts of Chile, adequate descriptions of the floristic and vegetational
diversity and complexity of Chile awaited the work of Munoz and Oberdorfer.
Heusser's recent treatise on the spores and pollen of the vascular plants
of Chile provides another essential resource on which to base studies on the
history of this extensive and ecologically diverse flora.
Knowledge of pollen and spore morphology is useful to plaits taxonomists,
while the ability to identify modern and subfossil palynomorphs permits pollen
analysis of lake and bog sediments and a reconstruction of the Pleistocene
palcoenviromnents. These ends are well-served by Heusser's useful and complete
volume describing the pollen and spores of Chile.
The vascular flora is extensive and the coverage of the book is virtually
complete; descriptions and clear photomicrographs of 698 species are included
in the manual. This covers 624 of the 920 genera in the Chilean flora and
represents 178 of the 182 families of vascular plants. The nomenclature is
according to Munoz.
PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN
LIFE SCIENCE BUILDING
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA TAMPA, FLORIDA 33620
All material described and illustrated is from documented herbarium specimens,
with in excess of 95% of the material from specimens collected in Chile.
Exceptions include about 20 types collected in North America, Europe or Africa;
many of these are other non-native species in genera which are included in
the Chilean flora.
Another 9 or 10 species are from material from other South American coutries;
in those cases the native Chilean species of the genus is usually illustrated.
Considering the paucity of pollen and spores on many her-barium specimens,
this is excellent coverage from native material. A few pollen types of introduced
species are included (Pinus, Agaue, AM us, Ailanthus, Pop« lus).
There are separate keys for spores and pollen; each of the twenty-six major
morphological types of pollen is treated in a separate key. This is the simplest
approach to keying pollen and the structure and terminology of the keys, as
well as the comparisons presented, are clear and generally unequivocal. Those
who object to polychotomous keys will be frustrated, however, since the number
of key alternatives, sometimes spread over successive pages, is unpredictable.
The illustrations of palynomorphs are entirely of original photomicrographs.
In most cases there are two or three photographs of the same material; the
clarity of the photographic detail of the surface sculpture as well as of
the optical sections of exine structure is exceptionally fine. Since pollen
is usually identified only to the generic level by pollen analysts, these
excellent illustrations will make the book an essential reference for pollen
analysts throughout South America and will be of worldwide interest.
This manual should be on the shelf of every
serious student of palynology and is an essential element
in collections of all libraries with full botanical coverage.
PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN LIFE SCIENCE BUILDING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA TAMPA,