PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN

VOLUME 40, NUMBER 3, AUTUMN, 1994

Editor: Meredith A. Lane, McGregor Herbarium, University of Kansas, 2045 Constant Ave., Lawrence KS 66047-3729 PH: 913/864-4493, FAX: 913/864-5298or-5093, E-Mail.: mlane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu

Editorial Committee for Volume 40
Clifford W. Smith (1994), Dept. of Botany, University of Hawaii, Honolulu HI 96822
Donald S. Galitz (1995), Dept. of Botany, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58103
Robert E. Wyatt (1996), Dept. of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
James D. Mauseth (1997), Dept. of Botany, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78713
Allison A. Snow (1998), Dept. of Plant Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210

Table of Contents
News from the Society, the Sections and the Committees
More 1993-1994 Young Botanists
Moving? Please Notify the Business Manager
What Your BSA Dues Do for You
New Corresponding Members
Dinner for All Botanists
Corresponding Members: Current Status and Call for Nominations
Travel Assistance to Latin American Botanical Congress
BSA Science and Engineering Fair Awards
Reports from the Committees
Reports from the Sections
PSB Needs New Editor
White House Releases National Science Policy Report
National Science Foundation Announces Special Competition
A Strategy for Reviewing Books for Journals - B. Gastel
Announcements
CSUBIOWEB
Mycologists Online
Call for Assistance
Awards
In Memoriam
Educational Opportunities
Funding Opportunities
Positions Available
Symposia, Conferences. Meetings
Book Reviews
Books Received

News from the Society, the Sections and the Committees

More 1993-1994 Young Botanists

The Society wishes to honor the following Young Botanists who accidentally were left off the list in PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN 40: 37 because their nominations were lost in mailing:

JOHN CAVALEITO
MARK ANDREW WEAVER
ALISON JAMEEN CURLESS

Are you moving? Have you just moved?

Don't forget to write! Last year the Business Office spent over $200 sending returned AJB s to members who had moved without sending notification. You are an important part of the BSA and we do not want to lose track of you! Be sure to include your phone, fax and e-mail address (if available). To save the Society money and assure uninterrupted mailing of your publications and other important BSA information, write, phone, fax or e-mail to:

Kim Hiser, BSA Business Manager at the address in box below:
PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN
ISSN 0032-0919
Published quarterly by Botanical Society of America, Inc., 1735 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210
Second class postage paid at Columbus, OH and additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to

Kim Hiser, Business Manager
Botanical Society of America
1735 Neil Ave.
Columbus OH 43210-1293
e-mail: KHISER@MAGNUS.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
PhonelFax:6141292-3519

70

What your BSA dues do for you:

Since 1989, individual members of the Botanical Society of America (BSA) have been paying annual dues of $22.50 (student members) or $55 (regular members). Although a dues increase of $5 (students) or $10 (regular members) per year was approved at the 1994 Annual Meeting and will go into effect with Volume 82 (1995) of the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, BSA membership is still one of the best bargains around.

Among the benefits BSA members receive are twelve issues of the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY (which published 1513 pages in the 1993 volume); four issues of the PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN; a copy of the Abstracts for the Annual Meeting; a membership Directory and Handbook; and assorted mailings from the Society. The actual cost to the BSA for producing and distributing these publications and other items is approximately $80 per member. Members submitting accepted manuscripts also receive up to 8 free pages per year in the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, pages which incur editorial charges of $135 per page without Society membership.

In addition to BSA publications, members' dues support a full-time Business Manager and her office at Ohio State University; activities of the 19 disciplinary and geographic Sections of the BSA; awards for the best high school botany projects at the International Science and Engineering Fair; travel awards to major international botanical meetings (e.g. the 1993 International Botanical Congress in Japan, the 6th Latin American Botanical Congress in Argentina [see elsewhere in this issue for details]; and representation on their behalf in the Council of Scientific Society Presidents and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Finally, member dues are also supporting a major society initiative, the BOTANY FOR THE NEXT MILLENNIUM study, which was undertaken to assess the current status of botany in the U.S. and future opportunities and directions for the discipline into the next century.

All in all, members of the Botanical Society of America can take pride in the many varied activities of their Society. These activities benefit BSA members directly as well as plant biologists who are not BSA members. For what are really very modest dues, BSA members are having an impact beyond their own Society, and members can make a further impact by encouraging colleagues to join the BSA.

- Judy Jernstedt, BSA Treasurer

71

NEW CORRESPONDING MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY

Four persons were elected to Corresponding Membership by the membership at the Annual business Meeting on Tuesday, 9 August in Knoxville, Tennessee. With three deaths this past year, and the four new members, there are currently 48 Corresponding Members. Please see the Call for Nomination of Corresponding Members for an analysis of distribution of current members. The new members and their areas of expertise are:
Pieter Baas (Netherlands): structure and development; systematic, phylogenetic and ecological aspects of wood anatomy.
Dianne Edwards (Wales): paleobotany; systematic and structural studies of early land plants from the Lower Devonian.
Ghillean Prance (England): systematics; monographic and floristic studies of tropi- cal angiosperms, economic botany.
Winfried Remy (Germany): paleobotany; broad based fossil studies including game- tophytes of Rhynia.

BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA - 1994 DINNER FOR ALL BOTANISTS

The Dinner for All Botanists was held on 10 August 1994 at the Hilton Hotel, Knoxville, Tennessee. After President Grady Webster introduced persons seated at the head table, the botanists attending the banquet were treated to a an excellent roast beef dinner. Following dessert, President Webster made the awards detailed on pages 83-84 of this issue.

After the awards, President Elect Harry T. (Jack) Horner addressed the audience and provided a guided tour of the crystals that may be found in plants and fungi. Dr. Horner had marvelous photographs of the remarkable diversity of crystalline structures and the many organs that produce them. He made allusions to animal systems in noting that the kidney stones that plague humans are similar in structure to the crystals that may be found in plants. The many examples that Dr. Homer provided made us all aware of the great complexity and diversity that eludes the casual observer and pointed out the value of the careful attention to detail that scientists can bring to the study of structure and function.

After Dr. Homer's presentation, outgoing President Webster formally turned the gavel and responsibility of conducting the business of the BSA over to incoming President Homer.

IMAGE

Dr. Christopher Haufler (left) outgoing Secretary, and Dr. Greg Anderson (right) outgoing Past President of the Society, share a pleasant moment at the Dinner for All Botanists. Photo by Kim Hiser. ~

72

CORRESPONDING MEMBERS: Current Status of and Call for Nominations

According to the BSA Bylaws, "Corresponding Members are distinguished senior scientists who have made outstanding contributions to plant science and who live and work outside the United States of America" (emphases added). The number of such persons is limited to 50. Corresponding Members are granted life membership in the BSA and enjoy all the privileges of regular Active Members. The current members (plus Carlos M. Herrera and Armando T. Hunziker elected in 1993, and Pieter Baas, Dianne Edwards, Ghillean Prance and Win fried Remy elected in 1994), and past honorees (now deceased) are listed on page 66 of the BSA MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY AND HANDBOOK.

It is now time for members to think about who you wish to nominate for consideration in 1994. There are currently 48 members, so there are two slots open. The nomination should consist of: a curriculum vitae of the proposed candidate, a detailed explanation of the qualifications and achievements of the candidate, and at least three (eight to ten support letters are usual) letters of support. It is preferable for nominations to be made without knowledge of the nominee. Nominations should be completed by 1 March 1995 to be considered for award of corresponding membership in August of 1995. Please send completed nominations to: Grady Webster, Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
The current distribution of Corresponding Members is as follows:

TABLE

Thus, the Corresponding Member Committee especially encourages nominations of distinguished female plant biologists, and persons from under-represented areas and disciplines.

Over the past year and a half we have been attempting to verify addresses of current Corresponding Members. We have not-been able to reach the following persons. If you know their correct current address please send it, or have them directly contact: Ms. Kim Hiser, BSA Office, Plant Science, 1735 Neil Avenue, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210-1293. Corresponding Members with in- adequate addresses include: Joji Ashida, Japan; Roger A. Buvat, France; Mikhail Kh Chailakhyan, Russia; Jack Dainty, Canada; Zygmunt Hejnowicz, Poland; Andzei L. Kursanov, Russia; Robert W. Schumacher, USA; William T. Stearn, England; Armen Leonovich Takhtajan, Russia; Andre M. Lwoff, France.

The Corresponding Members Committee consists of the Past-President and two most recent former Past-Presidents (Webster [chair], Anderson, and Culberson).
- G. J. Anderson

73

BSA OFFERS ASSISTANCE for TRAVEL to the LATIN AMERICAN BOTANICAL CONGRESS

The Botanical Society of America has allocated $2,000 to reimburse travel to the VIth Latin American Botanical Congress to be held in Mar del Plata, Argentina in October of 1994. Awards will be made on a competitive basis, with preference given to BSA members and/or Latin American botanists living in the U.S. A maximum of $250 per person will be granted. Members of the BSA may apply by writing a one page letter explaining why they wish to attend, the importance of the research to be presented, and financial need. The original letter of application (there are no forms) and four copies should be sent to Kim Hiser, BSA Business Office, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1293, by 15 October 1994. Awards will be determined by an ad-hoc com- mittee and announced by 1 December 1994.

Botanical Society of America awards prizes at International Science and Engineering Fair

On May 8-14, 1994, the International Science and Engineering Fair was held in Birmingham, Alabama. Approximately 930 high school students from the United Sates, its territories and 17 other countries participated. Sixty-two students presented botanical research, the seventh largest discipline represented. The Botanical Society of America awarded three cash prizes on the amounts of $250, $100 and $50. Each winner also received a copy of BSA's CAREERS IN BOTANY booklet and their schools received a one-year subscription to THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY. This year's winners were:

First: Isaac S. Bruck, Cary High School, Cary, NC: "Discovery and Characterization of Novel Anti-Plant Tumor Compound"

Second: Cliff, Haugen, Larimore High School, Larimore, ND: "Ecological Parameters for Drought Stress Remediation on Mined Land Reclamation"

Third: Christina M. Bourgeois, Shorecrest Preparatory School, St. Petersburg, FL: "Alteration of Microscopic Algae by Pollutants in Freshwater"

Six members of the Botanical Society served as judges for the Fair: Dr. William Bowen (Jacksonville St. University), Dr. Robert Boyd (Auburn University), Dr. Curt Peterson (Auburn University), Dr. James White (Auburn University at Montgomery), Dr. Malcolm Davis, Dr. Joseph O'Kelley, and Dr. Larry Davenport (Samford University) who served as the Chair of the judges.

IMAGE

Left to right: Dr. Larry Davenport, BSA representative., with Isaac S. Bruck, Clif P. Haugen, and Christina M. Bourgeois, winners of BSA awards at the Intemational Science and Engineering Fair.

74

Reports from Committees:

Conservation
Discussions were initiated with the B SA President for the Committee to organize a follow-up symposium on a topic of conservation and public policy interest (the theme of this year's AIBS meeting) for the 1995 BSA meeting in San Diego. In addition, the Committee provided suggestions to the AIBS on issues to be addressed at the 1994 meeting. Members of the Committee are in the process of preparing a column to run in the PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN on issues of conservation interest, perhaps in the format of an opinion/editorial piece, followed by responses. The Committee has recommended to the President that the BSA join the Association of Systematics Collections (ASC), a group that promotes management, funding, and educational programs for herbaria and other systematic collections. ASC has a cooperative agreement with the National Biological Survey for partnership in the Survey's collection and monitoring activities. Membership in ASC for an organization like the BSA is $100.00 per year.
- Rebecca Dolan, Chair.

Corresponding Members
The committee reviewed the qualifications of four individuals who had been recommended by sections as Corresponding Members of the BSA [see announcement of new corresponding members, page 72 of this issue]. Dossiers on two additional individuals arrived late and will be considered by next year's committee. The Committee also provided a break-down of current Corresponding Members and their expertise as well as a listing of the individuals from whom we had thus far been unable to obtain verification of contact [see this breakdown and list on page 73 in this issue].
- Gregory J. Anderson, Chair

Darbaker Prize
No prize was awarded this year because no nominations had been received. Next year's committee should publicize the award more widely.

Education
Dr. Kenneth Curry (University of Southern Mississippi), a member of the Education Committee, was instrumental in arranging the participation of the judges for the 1994 International Science and Engineering Fair in Birmingham, AL. [See story on the Fair in this issue.]

Next year's International Science and Engineering Fair will be in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. In order to present awards at this fair BSA will need to renew its participation in the ISEF for $250 for another three years. In addition, the ISEF has raised the minimum amount of cash awards to $500. In order to participate we must raise all of our awards to at least this level. The Committee suggests that BSA offer two awards next year; one for $700 and one for $500. Each school should continue to receive a one-year subscription to the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY. All of the students who present botany projects should receive a copy of Careers in Botany. A final expense of the participation in the ISEF is the cost of the judges travel to the Fair.
- Bruce Kirchoff, Chair

Election
The committee deliberated bye-mail and considered some 50-60 persons for two offices. From a slate of three candidates for each office, the membership elected Barbara Schaal as President and Darleen DeMason as Secretary.
- Gregory J. Anderson, Chair

Membership and Appraisal
Membership levels have held relatively stable at around 2700 over the last several years. There is no good reason why we can't get close to 3000 members. About 300 members are lost each year, but equal numbers join annually. We need to slow our losses and at least keep up the rate of new membership. A letter including a membership application was sent to selected individuals in most US Horticulture and Agronomy Departments last years

IMAGE

A handful of new members (10-15) joined in response to this effort. Plans for 1994-1995 include: 1) development of new streamlined brochures and posters for dispersement to the local membership coordinators. The new posters will contain a slot at the bottom so that updated membership information can be included each year. 2) Initiation of a South American letter writing campaign. There are less than 20 members in this huge continent. 3) Polling of former members asking them why they didn't renew membership. Hopefully guilt will override financial constraints.
- Jim Hancock, Chair.

Merit Awards
Awards were made at the annual Banquet [see story on awards, page 83 of this issue]. The Committee calls on Sections to consider carefully which of their members should be recommended for a BSA Merit Award.
- Shirley C. Tucker, Chair

Pelton Award
An awardee has been selected and that the award will be presented at the banquet. Because funding for this award is available only once every two years, there will be no Pelton Award next year.
- Elizabeth Lord, Chair

Special Papers Editorial
Twenty-four papers have been solicited or volunteered over the past year. Currently five are either in press or are accepted pending revisions. One paper is currently being reviewed. A draft of an additional manuscript has been forwarded to me for a "friendly" preliminary review. Several others are due in the coming year.
- Darleen A. DeMason, Chair

75

Reports from the Sections:

Bryological & Lichenological
The Section CO-sponsored (with the American Bryological and Lichenological Society) a diversity of activities at the Knoxville meetings, including two days of field trips in the Cumberland Plateau and Southern Unaka Range in the region. In addition to contributed papers sessions, two symposia have been organized and two student travel awards were made. The A.J. Sharp award was made at the meetings last year and will be judged and presented again at these meetings.
- Karen Renzaglia, Chair

Developmental and Structural Section
Developmental and Structural Section sponsored a symposium, "Dynamics of stem growth", and a special lecture, "Germination constraints in maize with the endosperm mutants ShrunkEn-2 and sugary enhancer". In addition, section sessions this year consisted of 45 contributed papers and 8 posters. The section includes 467 members.
- Judy Verbeke, Chair

Ecological Section
At the Knoxville Meetings the Ecological Section sponsored four symposia and cosponsored four Eco- logical Society symposia. A total of 68 contributed papers, in four sessions, and 33 posters were presented. There were 19 submissions for Best Student Paper Award. The awards for Best Student Paper at the 1993 meeting were presented to Donald Bailey and Jeffrey Walck at the 1994 BSA banquet in Knoxville.
- Kathleen Shea, Chair

Economic Botany
Because many economic botanists attended an Economic Botany meeting in Mexico City, only three papers are being presented at this year's BSA meetings. New officers were elected whose terms will begin after this year's meeting.
- Brian Boom, Chair

Genetics
The Section organized 18 contributed papers at the Knoxville meetings as well as a symposium on the genome organization of polyploid crops. Section dues were instituted to sustain the PLANT GENETICS NEWSLETTER.
- Donald Hauber, Vice-Chair

Historical
The Section sponsored a symposium on Charles Bessey at the Iowa meetings and a special lecture by Mary P. Winsor on, "Gilmour's demes, or, who should speak of species" at the Knoxville meeting.
- Laurence J. Dorr, Secretary-Treasurer

Microbiological No Report

Paleobotanical Section
The Paleobotanical Section had a program for the Knoxville meetings with fifty-one papers presented over three days. The Section also sponsored a field trip to Paleozoic localities in Tennessee and Kentucky. The Section currently has 247 members (173 regular members, 21 emeritus regular members, 28 affiliate members,

IMAGE

Needs a new Editor to begin with Volume 42 (January 1996)

Are you interested in desktop publishing? Would you like to correspond with botanical colleagues in many disciplines about books, articles and matters of interest to the BSA? Are you looking for a meaningful way to serve your Society? Need more information? If the answer to any of these questions is yes, please communicate your interest to the current Editor. (address, phone, fax and e-mail are on the front cover of this issue)

76

8 emeritus affiliate members, and 17 honorary members). The Bibliography of American Paleobotany for 1993, edited by Steven R. Manchester (University of Florida), is being distributed to members at these meetings and will be sent to non-attending members and 38 institutional subscribers in September. Copies will be provided for the BSA archives and the PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN when they are available.
- Charles P. Daghlian, Secretary-Treasurer

Phycological No report

Physiological
In spite of significant apathy, a contributed papers session was organized for this year's meeting. The section is still seeking ways to encourage more participation and involvement of plant physiologists in BSA activities.
- Henri R. Maurice, Chair

Phytochemical No report

Pteridologlcal Section
This year was one of considerable activity in the Pteridological Section. We sponsored, in conjunction with the American Fern Society, three field trips, a day of contributed papers (22), two symposia ('The Use of Molecular Data in Evolutionary Studies of Pteridophytes" and "The Homosporous Fern Ceratopteris as a Simple Plant Model System"), a poster session, and a special meeting on rare and endangered pteridophytes at the Knoxville meeting. A special meeting on "Rare and Endangered Pteridophytes of North America" was also held after the contributed paper session. Member- ship stands at 163 as of June 30 according to BSA records. Volume 6 of the Annual Review of Pteridological Research has been published under the auspices of the Pteridological Section and the International Association of Pteridologists.
- David S. Conant, Secretary

Systematics
The 855 BSA members affiliating with Systematics make it the largest section, representing 34% of the Society's membership as of30 June 1994. At the meeting in Knoxville, there were 12 contributed paper sessions containing 172 papers and two symposia were organized. The report from the Section to the Botany for the Next Millennium project is presently being completed. The Section's budgetary allotment for 1994-1995 is $1000, and discussions on how to most efficiently use these funds took place at the meeting in Knoxville. One suggestion was to initiate a best student paper award. The logistics and details of this proposal will appear in a future issue of the PSB. Members who have comments, questions or concerns, should feel free to contact me.
- Rob Wallace, Chair, (1-515-294- 0367; sl.rsw@isumvs.iastate.edu)

Teaching
Membership in the Teaching Section has declined a little. At this year's meeting there will be one session of contributed papers. The Teaching Section symposium has been scheduled late in the day so it will not to compete with other sessions. The annual service award will be presented at the BSA banquet-Donald Galitz, Secretary -Treasurer

Tropical No report

MidContinent
The Mid-Continent Section of the Botanical Society of America met with the 70th annual meeting of the SWARM Division of AAAS in Durango, Colorado, May 22-26, 1994. A contributed papers section attracted 20 papers. Gina M. Lipari, University of Northern Colorado, and Steven Mayes, Texas Tech University were judged winners of a Mid-Continent Section, BSA, Outstanding Paper Award for research presented by a graduate student The section also sponsored a special evening lecture, "Chromosomes and Evolution", by Raymond C. Jackson that was followed by a mixer. The section will meet next year in Norman, Oklahoma, with the 71st annual meeting of the SWARM Division of AAAS.
- H. James Price, Chair

Northeastern No report

Pacific
The Pacific Section has 250 members and met at San Francisco State University with the Pacific Division of AAAS. The program included an illustrated lecture on "Common and uncommon plant communities of central California" presented by Rodney Myatt and a symposium entitled "Enhancement of seed germination and establishment
- David Bilderback, Chair

Southeastern
The annual meeting of the section was held in conjunction with the association of Southeastern Biologists Annual meeting during April in Orlando, Florida, and featured the traditional breakfast with members of the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society. A workshop on Isozyme Electrophoresis, Hardy-Weinberg, and Plant Mating Systems was sponsored by the section and presented by Dr. David E. McCauley of Vanderbilt University as part of the section's teaching update activity. Ken McLeod finished his term as Chair and I was elected as Chair for 1994-97.
- Joe E. Winstead

77

WHITE HOUSE RELEASES NATIONAL SCIENCE POLICY REPORT

Vice President Al Gore released the Administration's policy statement, "Science in the National Interest", at a White House ceremony on August 3, 1994. This report calls for an investment in science as a national priority, and links scientific research and education to our national goals and to the future well-being of our country. The report identifies science as "an endless and sustainable resource with extraordinary dividents", and emphasizes that "our scientific strength is a treasure which we must sustain and build on for the future".

"Science in the National Interest" calls for a "strong commitment to investigator-initiated research and merit review by scientific peers". The theme that permeates the document is that pushing back the frontiers of knowledge will produce unanticipated benefits. The policy presented in this report stresses the need to tap scientific talent from every part of our diverse population as well as the need to raise the scientific literacy of all Americans.

The document proposes a series of actions to meet five broad goals for world leadership in science, mathematics and engineering:
* Maintain leadership across the frontiers of scientific knowledge.
* Enhance connections between fundamental research and national goals.
* Stimulate government, industry, and academic partnerships that promote investment in fundamental science and engineering and effective use of physical, human, and financial resources.
* Produce the finest scientists and engineers for the twenty-first century.
* Raise the scientific and technology literacy of all Americans.

The 31-page policy document, as issued by President Clinton's National Science and Technology Council, is available through the Science and Technology Information System at the National Science Foundation (send an e-mail request to pubs@nsf.gov).

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES SPECIAL COMPETITION

Retirement of taxonomic specialists, shifts in academic recruitment and staffing, and reductions in graduate training all conspire to diminish the knowledge that is needed to answer what the National Science Board has labeled a global biodiversity crisis ("Loss of Biological Diversity: A Global Crisis Requiring International Solutions", NSB 89-171). The rate of "extinction" among professional taxonomists led a National Science Foundation task force to call for enhanced training in taxon-specific expertise ("Adapting to the Future: Report of the BBS Task Force Looking to the 21st Century", NSF 91-69).

In partnership with academic institutions, botanical gardens, freshwater and marine institutes, and natural history museums the National Science Foundation seeks to enhance taxonomic research and help prepare future generations of experts. NSF announces a Special Competition, Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET), to support competitively reviewed research projects that target groups of poorly known organisms. Projects must encourage the training of new generations of taxonomists and translate current expertise into electronic databases and other formats with broad accessibility to the scientific community.

Projects designed for 5 years of effort are encouraged, with yearly budgets not to exceed $150,000 (direct plus indirect costs), or $750,000 total. Group Proposals could increase the budget according to the number of Principal Investigators involved. Standard components of taxonomic monography - species description and diagnosis, geographic distribution, scientific nomenclature, identification keys, illustration - are expected in all projects; training of two students and computerization activities are also required. NSF anticipates making 10-20 awards in Fiscal Year 1995 in this Special Competition, contingent upon availability of funds and quality of proposals received.

Proposals should be submitted for a March 1, 1995 postmark deadline to the address given in the "Grant Proposal Guide" (NSF 94-2, page 2). NSF's "Grant Proposal Guide" provides relevant forms and rules for, proposal preparation. On the cover sheet, upper left comer, write "DEB-PEET (NSF 94-109)" to expedite processing.

Institutional cost-sharing in accordance with standard NSF rules is expected on all projects. Institutional commitment to the employment of taxonomists during and beyond the duration of PEET projects provides, one clear example of partnership in answering the scientific and societal challenge of diminishing taxonomic expertise.

For the PEET Special Competition announcement( NSF 94-109 (new)], contact: Division of Environmental Biology (PEET) National Science Foundation, suite 6354201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, V A 22230
703-306-1481; fax: 703-306-0367; e-mail: sysrev@nsf.gov

78

IMAGE

A Strategy for Reviewing Books for Journals¹
Reprinted with permission from BIOSCIENCE 41:635-637, Oct 1991

Barbara Gastel²

"I'm a scientist, not a literary critic," many a biologist may silently protest when asked to review a book for a journal. "How can I be expected to produce a high-quality review?"

How? By drawing on skills and approaches you use as a scientist. Though a literary flair can enliven a review, book-reviewing for scientific journals is not a literary feat. Rather, it entails asking apt questions, gathering information to answer them, and presenting the findings and conclusions clearly - in short, the sorts of things that biologists do every day.

Deciding whether to review the book
Book reviewing is a valuable service, but you can serve readers, authors, publishers, and the journal best by choosing assignments carefully. You and the book must be well matched, the book must be worth reviewing, and you must be able to complete the review on time.

Finding appropriate reviewers often involves successive approximations. Especially if their journals span many areas, book review editors can lack adequate information to identify the most suitable reviewers. Thus, when contacted about writing a review, consider whether you and the book are indeed an appropriate match. Are you sufficiently versed in the subject matter? If so, are you free of potential conflicts of interest? (Such conflicts may exist, for example, if have you written a competing book, if the author was your mentor or student, or if you are preparing a volume for the same series.) If you conclude that you are not a suitable reviewer, suggest other candidates if you can.

Also consider whether the book is indeed worth reviewing. Editors generally try to assign for review only those books of sufficient quality and importance to justify using limited space in a journal. If at any point you feel that the book may not deserve review, contact the book review editor. Even a seriously flawed book can be worth reviewing if it also has substantial merits, or if it is being heavily promoted and thus its limitations should be made known. Sometimes, however, a book merely should retain the obscurity it deserves.

Finally, consider whether you have (or will make) time to prepare the review. By their nature, book re- views, especially in the sciences, should be timely.

And submitting reviews late disrupts the planning of the journal. If you doubt you could meet the deadline, refuse the invitation and suggest other reviewers.

Keep in mind the possibility of proposing a co- reviewer. If, for example, a book is interdisciplinary, collaborating with an expert in another relevant field can yield a stronger review. For some books, coauthoring a review with a colleague whose orientation is more theoretical or more applied than yours also can be of value. When reviewing a textbook, involving a student can add helpful perspective, as well as give the student some useful experience and an initial publication credit.
What about suggesting books for review or volunteering to be a reviewer? Book review editors tend to appreciate such initiatives. Calling their attention to little-publicized but valuable new books can be especially useful. And anything that helps editors expand their pools of qualified, willing, reliable reviewers is likely to be welcome - and to serve the journal's readers.

Identifying questions to ask
Although little information apparently exists about how journal readers actually use book reviews - or even about the extent to which they read them - book reviews have certain recognized functions. A main function, of course, is to acquaint readers with worthwhile books and to inform the readers of those books' strengths and limitations. Another function, especially for reviews in journals of wide scope, is to broaden readers' familiarity with their own and related fields; through reviews that place books in context and convey some of their content, readers can learn indirectly from books. Also, reviewers can help teach readers what characterizes a good book, which in turn can aid them in tasks such as evaluating books for courses and writing books of their own.

To serve these functions, a review should both describe and evaluate a book. Among questions that many reviewers should address, and thus that reviewers should keep in mind, are the following:
* What is the purpose of the book? According to the authors or editors, what does the book aim to do? How worthwhile is this goal? How well does the book accomplish it?
* From what context did the book emerge? For example, does the book reflect the development of a new field? Is it on a controversial topic? Is it based on a symposium? Is it a sequel or part of a set?

79

* Who wrote or edited the book? What are the qualifications and affiliations of the authors or editors? What are their previous accomplishments? If pertinent, to what school of thought do the authors or editors subscribe?
* Of what does the book consist? What is the scope of the content? How is the content organized? Does the format have any special features? What main points does the book make? What are some noteworthy things it says?
* What are the strengths and weaknesses of the book? How accurate and complete is the information? How sound are any central arguments? Does the book make a substantial new contribution? How readable, and otherwise how skillful is the writing? If the book includes features such as illustrations, a glossary, or an index, of what quality are they? If it lacks such features, is their absence a problem? How well designed and produced is the book? If, for example, the book is a field guide or laboratory manual, does its form suit its function? Is the book reasonably priced?
* How does the book compare with other works? If the book is a second or later edition, how does it differ from its precursor? If it is a textbook, how does it compare with the competition? If the author has written earlier books, how does this one stack up?
* Who would find this book of interest and use? Would the book be of value to specialists in the field? Is it suited for students at given levels? Would it interest policy makers or segments of the public?

By addressing questions such as these, you can prepare a review that fulfills its functions well.

Gathering the Information
During my first stint as a book review editor, I approached a favorite former professor about reviewing a book in his field. "Does this mean," he asked, "that I should read the book?" At the time, I felt amazed at his naivete. But now I realize that I may have been the naive one - for although answering questions such as those above usually requires reading the book thoroughly, sometimes the task requires less or more.

Generally, of course, you should read the book completely and carefully. Consider taking a sandwich approach: scan the book for an overview, then read it in detail, and then scan it again for the big picture. To aid in writing the review, take notes while you read; record, for example, possible points to make, passages to consider quoting, ideas for organizing and wording the review, and items to check for accuracy.

Sometimes reading a work from cover to cover is neither feasible nor appropriate. Rare is the reviewer who would plow through a massive reference text, an encyclopedia of science, or a scientific dictionary. Nor would doing so be valid, as such works are meant to be drawn on selectively. When reviewing such a work, determine its general characteristics and then sample the content. One approach is to sample entries totally at random. Another is to take a systematic sample; for instance, sample some entries in your own subfield (for accuracy and completeness) and in some other subfields (for usefulness to relative outsiders). And a third approach is to consult the' work as appropriate occasions arise and keep a log of the findings. Sampling also can complement traditional approaches to reviewing; for example, you can use it to gather data on recency of references or on adequacy of indexing.

Consulting materials other than the book can strengthen a review. Consider drawing on sources of historical: information, looking at competing and other related' books, and referring to previous items by and about the authors or editors. Doing so can help you more fully, accurately, and effectively show how the current book fits in.

Also, consulting other people can enhance a review. ! If the book is meant at least in part for students, show it to some of them and report their reactions. Ditto if members of the public are an intended audience. If the writing or graphic design strikes you as especially good or bad, see what a colleague in such a field has to say. Supplementing your own reading with the use of such' sources can yield a more complete and useful review.

Writing the review
Having gathered the information for the review, you are ready to write it: Or, more precisely, you are almost ready. Before starting to write, be sure to review the instructions from the book review editor. Check such items as how long the review should be, what sort of heading it should have, and whether it should be double spaced. In writing book reviews as in writing scientific, papers, following the instructions from the journal is crucial to accurate, smooth, and prompt publication.

Also, in book reviewing as in other scientific writing, looking at good models can help. BioScience sends reviewers examples of reviews that it has published. If you are reviewing for a journal that does not do so, track down some sample reviews from recent issues. Not only can such reviews illustrate suitable content and format, they also can aid in ascertaining the usual level and tone' of reviews that appear in the journal.

Before setting pen to paper (or digits to keyboard, or voice to tape), perhaps discuss the book with others. Doing so can help you formulate your ideas and come up with effective ways to express them. It can also aid in determining what readers would want to know about the book. Having discussed the book, you may find the review in essence largely written.

One question that may remain, however, is how to organize the review. Unlike scientific papers, book reviews lack a standard structure; the information can be

80

presented in any reasonable order. This flexibility can be a plus, especially for reviewers who enjoy the craft of writing. However, lack of a format also can be a problem, delaying the writing of reviews and leading to submission of reviews that are ineffectively structures.

A solution that often works is to structure the book review much like a scientific paper. In other words, adapt the IMRAD format: introduction, methods, results and discussion. A review that is organized in this way can readily address the questions it should.

The introduction section of a book review in this format can take various approaches. One possibility is to start with historical or other background so that readers can place the book in context. Another is to begin with a capsule description and an assessment of the book - in other words, a miniature abstract of the review. A third option is to draw readers in by summarizing some of the most interesting material in the book. Often, a combination of these approaches works well.

If you evaluated the book other than by reading it from cover to cover, the review also should describe the methods used. Sometimes these methods (for instance, sampling the book's content) are most logically presented early in the review, shortly after the introduction section. In other cases, descriptions of methods fit better later in the review. For example, they may be interspersed with observations and conclusions to which their use led.

Somewhat equivalent to a results section is the description of the book. Here you should note such items as the scope, organization, and format of the book; the main arguments presented (if any); and the presence of special features. Either this section or the introduction can be a suitable place to identify the purpose of the book and provide background on the authors or editors.

In describing the book, avoid merely reciting the table of contents. Rather, try to convey the essence of the book. For example, when reviewing a conference proceedings, do not list all the titles and authors; instead, supply a brief overview and then focus on the most noteworthy contributions. The book review section of a journal should not read like Current Contents.

A review should, as previously noted, contain your assessment of the book. Often, much or all of the assessment fits most logically at the end of the review, in a portion analogous to a discussion section. Here you can state the strengths and limitations of the book, compare the book with others, and note the audience for which the book is suited. In book reviews, as in scientific papers, summarizing your main point is generally an effective way to end. Book reviews in some journals, including BioScience, can list references.

In presenting your assessment, strive for balance. A review is not an advertisement, and you owe it to readers to mention any substantial weaknesses. But the word to remember is substantial Avoid the temptation to nitpick. And though scathing reviews are often cathartic to write

IMAGE

and amusing to read, a sarcastic tone rarely serves science (or the community of scientists). If you have criticisms that are too detailed to include but could aid in preparing future editions, consider sending them to the authors or editors of the book, either directly or through the publisher.

Like other scientific writing, book reviews should be clear and concise, without overly specialized jargon. They should contain evidence to illustrate and support their points, but they should not overburden readers with detail. Ideally, they should be interestingly written. If word play or other wit is your style, here is your chance to have some fun - and still earn at least a minor line for your curriculum vitae.

After drafting your review, set it aside. Then come back and edit it. Maybe show it to one or more colleagues; in book reviewing, as in other writing peer review can improve the product. Before submitting the review, check it for accuracy. In particular, make sure that all names are spelled correctly.

If others have published reviews of the book, should you read theirs before submitting yours? Doing so can be helpful, but doing so too early may bias your assessment. One reasonable tack is to draft your review, then scan the others for major points you may have missed, and then prepare your final version.

Last, check your review against the instructions, produce a final copy, and submit the review on time. When editors and readers compliment you on the review, think to yourself, "Of course, it's a fine review. After all, I'm a scientist."

¹ Copyright 1991, American Institute of Biological Sciences
² Department of Journalism, Texas A&M University, College Station TX

81

Announcements

CSUBIOWEB

Steven J. Wolf at CSU Stanislaus has recently received a grant to establish CSUBIOWEB, a Biological Sciences World Wide Web (WWW) server for the California State University system. Its purpose is to consolidate existing WWW biological sciences teaching and research resources and to create new multimedia teaching materials that can be shared on-line throughout the CSU system and the world. For those unfamiliar with the WWW, it uses hyperlinks and multimedia techniques to make the Internet easier to use and more accessible to those with little knowledge of computers. At the heart of the WWW is Mosaic, a multiplatform, public domain computer program that runs on both Macintosh and Microsoft Windows personal computers, as well as workstations using X Windows. Mosaic is analogous to the graphical user interface (GUI) used by Macintosh and Microsoft Windows computers. Clicking on hyperlinks-terms, images or icons in documents that point to other, related documents, automatically transmits information from one computer to any other WWW linked computer in the world. Memory resident viewers on the client allow the information to be viewed and/or heard immediately, or stored for later use. Information may consist of text, images, movies, sounds, or any combination thereof. In addition to providing multimedia access to the Internet, Mosaic can also be used as a very powerful stand alone, multimedia instructional program (see article in the 12 August issue of SCIENCE).

Virtually every major library, educational, research and governmental organization in the developed world is already accessible via the WWW and additional organizations continue to be added daily. All the software

IMAGE

associated with the WWW is public domain. Therefore, for about $100, the cost of an Ethernet card, most personal computers will be able to access the server. A workshop on CSUBIOWEB and the WWW will be held at the next Association of Biologists using Computers (ABC) meeting at San Jose State University in January 1995. Demonstration materials and information about CSUBIOWEB are currently on-line at the following URL: http://130.17.2.215/wolf/csuwww.html. Contact your campus computer support personnel for information on accessing CSUBIOWEB via Mosaic. E-mail inquiries are also welcomed at swolf@koko.csustan.edu.

MYCOLOGISTS ONLINE

is a world directory of mycologists and lichenologists or researchers studying fungi including lichens, herbaria and collections, and mycological periodicals, who and which are accessible by E-mail. The list is under construction; the most recent list includes more than 200 entries. Please help to update the directory and send your E-mail address to one of the editors: LIZON, Pavel <PL18@cornell.edu> Plant Pathology Herbarium, Cornell University, 401 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14853-4203, USA or PARMASTO, Erast <erast@iozb.tartu.ee> Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Academy of Sciences, 21 Vanemuise St., EE-2400, Estonia. The directory will be posted in the Harvard University Biodiversity and Biological Collections Gopher. The preliminary list is available via E-mail on request.

Call for Assistance

Results of Restoration Ecology Projects We are preparing a textbook on restoration ecology for use in advanced undergraduate courses. We are interested in receiving reports, summaries, or articles about restoration projects for inclusion as case histories in the book. We are particularly interested in projects that have measured success or failure of the plantings, sub- sequent colonization by plants and/or animals, or have used other methods of monitoring performance. We are aware that the results of many restoration projects are not fully reported in the open literature, but in reports to regulatory or supervisory agencies. We will fully acknowledge and cite any data or material used. Con- tact: Steven N. Handel or Joan G. Ehrenfeld, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway NJ 08855-1059 USA, FAX: 11908/445-5870; E-mail: handel@gandalf.rutgers.edu.

82

Awards

Michaux Grants
Kathleen Shea and Eric Ribbens
Two BSA members were recently awarded American Philosophical Society Michaux Grants in Silviculture, Forest Botany, and the History of Forest Botany: Eric Ribbens, University of Connecticut, $4200, "Past Growth History as Predictors of Reproductive OutPut." and Kathleen L. Shea, St. Olaf College, $2700, "Genetic Variation among and within Populations of Balsam Fir."

Lois H. Tiffany
Distinguished Professor
On 4 May 1994, Lois H. Tiffany, Chair of the Department of Botany at Iowa State University was named "Distinguished Professor," the highest academic honor at ISU. Dr. Tiffany is the first woman scientist from the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences to receive this award. She is a mycologist and member of the Plant Pathology faculty. She was the first person to receive the Weston award for Mycology Teaching and has been inducted into Iowa's Women's Hall of Fame.

The following prizes were awarded on 10 August 1994, at the Dinner for All Botanists given by the Botanical Society of America (BSA) at its Annual Meeting held in Knoxville, Tennessee, in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.

BSA Merit Awards - These awards are made to persons judged to have made outstanding contributions to the field of botany. This year two botanists were selected. One of these awards was made to Gregory J Anderson, tropical systematist, authority on Solanum and pollination biology, stimulation teacher, dedicated and effective voice of the Botanical Society as Secretary and President, and whole plant biologistin every sense. The other Merit Award went to Lafayette Frederick, prominent educator, mycologist, tireless promoter of students in science, superlative and inspiring teacher for over 40 years, and outstanding role model for students and faculty.

Samuel Noel Postlethwait Award – The Teaching Section announced three recipients of the Samuel Noel Postlethwait Award for exceptional service on behalf of the Teaching Section of the BSA. Awards were presented to Richard L Franks of the Carolina Biological Company for his series of workshops, “Using Wisconsin Fast Plants^TM in Classroom research” and to Jeanette Mullins and Jan Ballings for their unselfish dedication to the activities of the Teaching Section and for the promotion of the continuing symposium on “Essential Botanical Knowledge at College/University Level.”

Isabel C. Cookson Paleobotanical Award – Each year the Isabel C. Cookson Award is given for the best contributed paper in paleobotany or palynology presented at the annual meeting. This year’s award went to Sharon D. Kalvins of Southern Illinois University for her paper co-authored with Lawrence C. Matten and entitled “The frond of Lyceya hibernica (Lyginopteridales) from the Uppermost Devonian of Ireland.”

George R. Cooley Award – This award is given annually by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists for the best paper in plant systematics presented at the annual meeting. This year the award was presented to J. Mark Porter of the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, for his paper entitled, “Evolution of pollination mechanisms in Gilia section Giliandra (Polemoniaceae): Inferences based on nrDNA ITS sequence data.”

Margeret Menzel Award – This award is given by the Genetics Section for an outstanding paper presented in the contributed papers sessions of the annual meeting. This years award went to Scott A. Hodges for his paper co-authored by Michael L. Arnold and entitled “Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens.”

Ecological Section Award - Each year the Ecological Section of the Botanical Society offers an award for the best student paper presented at the annual meetings. A judging committee evaluates each student presentation and selects a winner based on the quality of the work and the presentation. Two awards from 1993 were presented at the BSA banquet, one to Jeffery L. Walck of the University of Kentucky for his talk, “What is a persistent seed bank in Solidago,” and a second to Donald R. Bailey, of Ohio University for his talk, “Population decline of Larix laricina in central Appalachian peatland.”

Distinguished Paper in Phycology Award – This award is given for the most outstanding manuscript dealing with any discipline of algal research published in the American Journal of Botany in the preceding year. This year the award was presented to Sophie Richerd, Christophe Destombe, Joel Cuguen, and Myriam Valero for their paper entitled “Variation of reproductive success in a haplo-diploid red alga, Gracilaria verrucosa: effects of parental identities and crossing distance.”

Physiological Section Award – Each year the Physiological Section presents the Li-co Prize which acknowledges the best presentation made by any student, regardless of sub-discipline, at the annual meeting. This year’s award went to Michael R. Bynum form the University of Wyoming, Laramie, for his paper entitled, “Rapid and reversible floral movements in artic gentians: Benefits for male and female fitness in an alpine environment.”

83

Katherine Esau Award - This award is given to the graduate student who presents the outstanding paper in developmental and structural botany during the annual meeting. The award is made from the interest on a gift from Dr. Esau. The award in 1993 was presented to Stuart F. Baum from the University of California, Davis, for his paper co-authored by Thomas L. Rost and entitled, "Analysis of Arabidopsis root development."

A.J. Sharp Award - This award is given for the best student paper presented in the American Bryological and Lichenological sessions. This year there were two honorable mentions. The first to Steven K. Rice of Duke University for his paper co-authored by Peter H. Schuepp and entitled, "The influence of branch and leaf morphology on boundary layer resistance in Sphagnum trinitens and S. recurvum." and the second to, Kevok Leung Yip of Baylor University for the paper entitled, "Ultrastructure of the sporophyte-gametophyte junction in Ephemerum cohaerens." This year's A.J. Sharp Award went to Alison Withey of Duke University for her paper entitled, "Developing a hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships of the Spiridentaceae (Musci) based on morphological and molecular data."

Edgar T. Wherry Award - This award is made annually by the Pteridological Section of the BSA for the best presentation during the contributed papers sessions. This year's award went to Robert Joel Duff for his paper co-authored with Edward Schilling and entitled, "Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and evidence of structural rearrangements in lsoetes."

Jeanette Siron Pelton Award - The Conservation and Research Foundation honors the memory of Jeanette Siron Pelton with sponsorship of this award given for sustained and imaginative productivity in the field of experimental plant morphology. This year's award went to Elliot M. Meyerowitz from the California Institute of Technology. Dr. Meyerowitz has combined a genetic and developmental approach to flowering that has profoundly affected the field of plant morphogenesis by discovering regulatory genes that confer identity during organogenesis.

Henry Allan Gleason Award - this award is made annually by the New York Botanical Garden for an outstanding recent publication in the field of plant taxonomy, plant ecology, or plant geography. The 1994 award went to Robert L. Dressler of the Florida Museum of Natural History at the University of Florida, for his book entitled, "Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family." Dr. Dressler's book represents a lifetime synthesis of fieldwork, herbarium research, and literature review of the orchid family.

Jesse M. Greenman Award - This award is given annually by the Missouri Botanical Garden in recognition of the best thesis based on a Ph.D. dissertation concerning the systematics of vascular plants or bryophytes published during the previous year. The 1994 award was presented to Melissa Luckow of Cornell University for her publication entitled "Monograph of Desmanthus (Leguminosae- Mimosoideae)," published as volume 38 of Systematic Botany Monograph. This study is based on a Ph.D. dissertation from the University of Texas, Austin, under the direction of Dr. Beryl B. Simpson.

Lawrence Memorial Award - was established to commemorate the life and achievements of Dr. George H. M. Lawrence. Proceeds from the fund are presented by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation of Carnegie-Mellon University and are used to support travel expenses of a doctoral candidate for research in systematic botany, horticulture, or the history of the plant sciences. This year's award went to Kathleen M. Pryer of Duke University. For her dissertation research, Ms. Pryer has undertaken a phylogenetic and developmental study of the water ferns in the family Marsileaceae. The proceeds of the award will help support her travel in southern Africa.

84

In Memoriam

Lothar Geitler, Ove Arbo Hoeg, and Susan LeClercq
These scientists were all Corresponding Members of the Botanical Society of America. Anyone wishing to contribute memorial statements about any of them to the PSB are invited to do so.

Mary Elizabeth Cosner
Dr. Mary Elizabeth Cosner died on 22 June 1994 at the age of 35. She received B.S. degrees in General Studies and Horticulture at Capital University and Ohio State University. Mary Beth completed a masters degree in Botany in 1988 at Ohio State working on allozyme variation in Coreopsis. In 1993 she received her Ph.D. also at Ohio State. Her dissertation research, which was funded by an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Grant, focused on characterizing very complex structural rearrangements in the chloroplast genomes of the angiosperm family Campanulaceae. While at Ohio State, Mary Beth received several honors, including the prestigious University Presidential Fellowship and the Butler Award for the outstanding graduating Doctoral student in Plant Biology. She was a postdoctoral fellow in Biology at Indiana University at the time of her death. Mary Beth will be missed by everyone who knew and interacted with her. She was a very important member of both of our laboratories and she leaves many good memories for all of us. Her honesty, good sense of humor, and willingness to help others benefited everyone.

A fund has been established in Mary Beth's name to honor graduate students in Plant Biology at Ohio State University. Contributions should be made out to the M. E. Cosner Memorial Fund and sent to either of us.-Daniel J. Crawford, Department of Plant Biology, Ohio State University, 1735 Neil Ave., Columbus OH 43210; Robert K. Jansen, Dept. of Botany, University of Texas, Austin TX 78713.

IMAGE

Educational Opportunities

Graduate Research Assistantships
University of Hawaii
The University of Hawaii seeks outstanding candidates for its NSF Graduate (Ph.D. or M.S.) Research Training assistantships in ecology, evolution and conservation biology. For application information and materials, contact Kenneth Kaneshiro (Chair) or Rosemary Gillespie (Associate Chair), CCRT, University of Hawaii, 3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409, Honolulu, HI 96822. (808) 956 8884, e-mail: gillespi@uhunix.uhcc.hawaiLedu. Deadline: Feb. 1 1995. Assistantships commence August 1995.

Minority Internship
Smithsonian Institution
Internships, offered through the Office of Fellowships and Grants, are available for students to participate in research and museum-related activities for periods of nine to twelve weeks during the summer, fall, and spring. U.S. minority undergraduate and graduate students are invited to apply. The appointment carries a stipend of $250 per week for undergraduate and $300 per week for graduate students, and may provide a travel allowance. Deadlines: For Summer (to begin after June 1 - February 15; For Fall (to begin after September 1) - June 15; For Spring (to begin after January 1): October 15. For applications and/or information, please write: Smithsonian Institution, Office of Fellow- ships and Grants, 955 L'Enfant Plaza, Suite 7000, Washington DC 20560, USA, or e-mail: siofg@sivm.sLedu.

85

Funding Opportunities

Research Fellowships
Smithsonian Institution
Smithsonian Fellowships are awarded to support independent research in residence at the Smithsonian in association with the research staff and using the Institutions's resources. Under this program, senior fellowships of three to twelve months, predoctoral and postdoctoral fellowships of three to twelve months, and graduate student fellowships of ten weeks are awarded. Proposals for research in areas including Biological Sciences may be made. Deadline: January 15, 1995. Postdoctoral Fellowships are offered to scholars who have held the degree or equivalent for less than seven years. Senior Fellowships are offered to scholars who have held the degree or equivalent for seven years or more. The term is 3 to 12 months. Both fellowships offer a stipend of $25,000 per year plus allowances. Predoctoral Fellowships are offered to doctoral candidates who have completed preliminary course work and examinations. The term is 3 to 12 months. The stipend is $14,000 per year plus allowances. Graduate Student Fellowships are offered to students to conduct research in association with research staff members of the Smithsonian. Students must be formally enrolled in a graduate program of study, have completed at least one semester, and not yet have been advanced to candidacy if in a Ph.D. Program. The term is 10 weeks; the stipend is $3,000. Awards are based on merit. Smithsonian fellowships are open to all qualified individuals without reference to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or condition of handicap of any applicant.. For more information and application forms, please write: Smithsonian Institution, Office of Fellow- ships and Grants, 955 L'Enfant Plaza, Suite 7000, Washington DC, 20560 USA, or e-mail: siofg@sivm.si.edu. Please indicate the particular areas in which you propose to conduct research and give the dates of degrees received or expected.

1995 Michaux Grants
The American Philosophical Society announces the 1995 competition for research grants in forest botany (specifically, dendrology), silviculture, and the history thereof. Grants range from $1,500 to ca. $5,000. Eligible expenses include travel, $65 per diem toward the cost of room and meals, and consumable supplies not available at the applicant's institution. Applicants are normally expected to have the doctorate, but proposals may be considered from graduate students who have completed all degree requirements but the dissertation. Deadline: February 1, for decision in May. When writing for application forms, briefly (100 words or less) describe the proposed research and budget. No telephone requests, please! Michaux Fund Grants, American Philosophical Society, 104 S. 5th Street, Philadelphia PA 19106-3387.

Positions Available

Article Writers
Gale Research, Inc.
Quality writers are needed to contribute articles to the Gale Encyclopedia of Science. Designed for high school students and general readers, the encyclopedia will be comprised of entries ranging from 100 to 4,000 words and covering basic terms and concepts from all scientific disciplines. Candidates with scientific back- grounds and previous publishing experience highly preferred; must be able to explain technical concepts to a general audience. Contributors required to do their own research. Please send writing sample and resume to: Bridget Travers, Gale Research, Inc., 835 Penobscot Building, Detroit, MI 48226-4094.

National Science Foundation (NSF) Program Directors
NSF's Division of Environmental Biology (formerly Biotic Systems and Resources) is seeking qualified applicants for Program Director positions in fiscal year 1994. The incumbents to these positions will ad- minister grant programs in support of research in the following areas: Ecology, Systematic Biology, Population Biology, Ecosystem studies, and Research Collections in Ecology and Systematics Programs. These positions will be filled on a 1- or 2-year visiting scientist/temporary basis and are excepted from the competitive civil service. The per annum salary range is $56,627 to $88,255. The visiting scientist receives a leave of absence from his/her employer and salary is set in accordance with NSF's Visiting Scientist program. Applicants must have a Ph.D. or equivalent experience. In addition, six or more years of successful research experience beyond the Ph.D. is required. Some administrative experience is also desired. Applications are also being accepted for future vacancies for these positions. Applicants should submit a Standard Form 171, Applications for Federal Employment, or resume to: National Science Foundation, Division of Human Re- source Management, Room 315, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, V A 22230. Attention: Catherine Handle. Telephone: 703/306-1185 for further information about the NSF application process, or 703/306-1480 for technical details on these specific positions. Hearing impaired individuals should call 703/306-0090. NSF is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

IMAGE

86

Systematic Botanist
California Academy of Sciences
The California Academy of Sciences invites applications for an Assistant Curator of Botany. Applications are solicited from individuals with primary interest in and commitment to active, collection-oriented research in higher plant systematics and the curation, operation, and development of a major herbarium. Candidates must have a Ph.D., an active research program with demonstrated interest and competence in a particular group of vascular plants, and be prepared to participate in a variety of curatorial, administrative, and public educational activities at the Academy. Applicants should forward a curriculum vitae, description of re- search goals, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: Human Resources, No. ACB, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118-4599. Deadline for applications is 15 October 1994. EOE. General information about the California Academy of Sciences and each of its research departments (including the Department of Botany) is available from the Academy's gopher server at the following address: cas .calacademy .org.

Plant Molecular Systematist
New York Botanical Garden
The New York Botanical Garden invites applications for the position of Plant Molecular Systematist in the Institute of Systematic Botany. Qualifications include a Ph.D. in Botany or Biology, demonstrated excellence in molecular systematics, a strong background in plant taxonomy, and several years of post-doctoral experience. The successful candidate will conduct research in botanical or mycological systematics with an emphasis on employing molecular techniques. Work will involve teaching and advising of students in the Garden's Graduate Studies Program, and publishing research results in peer-reviewed scholarly journals. The individual occupying this position will also be expected to secure grant funds and assist in other departmental and division-wide duties. This position begins April 1, 1995. Excellent benefits. To apply submit a letter stating research interests and goals, vita, and the names of three references to Personnel Manager-MS, the New York Botanical Garden, 200th Street and Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York 10458-5126, USA. FAX:718/220-6504. AA/EOE/M/F/D/V.

Systematic Botanist
The Field Museum
The Field Museum is seeking an outstanding systematic botanist for a career-track appointment in the Department of Botany at the level of Assistant Curator. Candidates pursuing innovative specimen-based re- search in macrofungi, lichens, bryophytes, pteridophytes or angiosperms, and who are also making important contributions in a second field such as conservation, ethnobotany, theoretical systematics, developmental biology or population genetics, will be given special attention. In addition to research, responsibilities include curation of relevant collections and participation in public education and exhibit programs, the successful candidate will have a Ph.D., a proven record of scientific achievement and the ability to establish an externally funded research program. Curators teach at local universities and there are opportunities for participating in undergraduate and graduate training. The Botany Department is part of the Museum's Center for Evolutionary and Environmental Biology which includes the departments of Geology and Zoology. Facilities include an herbarium of over 2.5 million specimens (including one of the world's richest collections of neotropical plants), an outstanding library, and molecular systematics and biochemical laboratories. Consideration of applications will begin on October 17, 1994. To apply submit a Curriculum Vitae, a statement of research objectives, names, addresses and contact numbers of at least 3 references, and copies of relevant publications to: Search Committee, Department of Botany, the Field Museum, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago IL 60605-2496. E-mail inquiries: botany@fmnh.org. As an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action employer we especially encourage applications from women and minorities and we are responsive to dual-career needs.

Viticulture and Enology Professor
University of California, Davis
Nominations and applications are invited for a tenured position available July I, 1995. The appointee will have teaching and student advising responsibilities and will be expected to initiate a research program pertinent to the California grape and wine industry. The monetary award from the Amerine endowment is to support research in this area. The appointment to the Maynard A. Amerine Chair is for 5 years, subject to renewal on review. Qualifications include a Ph.D. or equivalent degree in a discipline relevant to viticulture and/or enology, teaching and research experience in a relevant discipline, and a record of scholarly and academic achievement. Disciplines encompassed by the department include plant and microbial genetics and bio- chemistry, plant physiology, microbiology, chemistry, sensory science, and chemical and biochemical engineering. Applicants should submit a curriculum vitae with a list of publications, reprints of publications, statement of research and teaching interests and back- ground in each, and the names and addresses of at least three references to: Ann C. Noble, Search Committee Chair, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis CA 95616-8749. Applications must be received by November I, 1994. The University of California is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

87

Plant Systematist
Colorado State University
Assistant professor in systematics of higher plants, Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. This tenure-track position involves approximately 40% teaching, 40% research, and 20% service, including herbarium curation, he successful candidate will be expected to develop an independent, externally funded research program in contemporary plant systematics using molecular-genetic techniques to study phylogenetic relationships. The candidate will also oversee curation of the Colorado State University herbarium (CS). Abundant opportunities exist for collaboration with biologists within the department as well as in other departments and colleges at the University and with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program. Teaching responsibilities include a course in modern plant systematics and participation in the botany/biology undergraduate and graduate curriculum. A Ph. D. in Botany or a related area is required. Curatorial and postdoctoral experience are strongly favored. Candidates should exhibit potential for independent and innovative research and teaching, and a willingness to cooperate with a broad spectrum of biologists on campus. SALARY: Commensurate with education and experience. Position is available immediately, although the search may be extended if suitable candidates are not found. To apply, send a letter of application with a statement of your teaching and re- search interests, a curriculum vitae, university transcripts, names and addresses of five persons who will serve as references, and no more than three publications to: Secretary Plant Systematics Search Committee Department of Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 telephone (303) 491-7013; fax (303) 491-0649; e-mail: botteron@lamar.colostate.edu Additional information or answers to specific questions may be obtained from breeves@lamar.colostate.edu (Dr. F. B. Reeves, Search Committee Chair) via e-mail All materials are due by 15 October, 1994. The search may be extended if suitable candidates are not found. Colorado State University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer; protected class members are encouraged to apply and to so identify themselves.

Botanical Research Manager
Australian Royal Botanic Gardens
This is an outstanding opportunity to join the Royal Botanic Gardens and lead the day-to-day operation of the Research Branch of the Research and Herbarium Division. The Royal Botanic Gardens is expanding and diversifying its research activities and you will playa major role in this process. The National Her- barium of Victoria is a major centre of botanical studies in Victoria and the collection of over one million plant specimens is one of the largest and most important collections in Australia. We are looking for an enthusiastic and versatile botanist with extensive research experience, preferably in the field of systematics, to coordinate the overall research activities of the Branch. You will provide scientific leadership to research staff and initiate and develop original research projects related to the objectives of the Royal Botanic Gardens. You will also conduct your own research and make a significant contribution to the research program of the Royal Botanic Gardens. You will have a relevant post- graduate qualification, possess good conceptual and analytical skills, and have experience in project management and the evaluation of research programs at a senior level in a scientific environment. You will have well developed interpersonal and communication skills and an ability to communicate effectively with staff, researchers in other organizations, and the public. The position offered is for a five year term, and the salary is in the range $45,214-$47,866, plus the employer contribution to superannuation. Copies of the duty statement and selection criteria are available from Patricia Quinn, Personnel Manager, phone (61-3-) 655 2300 or fax (61-3-) 655 2350. Additional information about the position is available from Dr Jim Ross, phone (61- 3- )6552300. Please do not direct enquires via email. Applications should be submitted to the Personnel Manager, Royal Botanic Gardens, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. by 5pm, Wednesday, 31 August 1994. The Royal Botanic Gardens is an EEO employer and offers a non-smoking workplace.

Administrator - Supervisory Ecologist
National Biological Survey
The National Biological Survey anticipates an opening for the Chief of the Wetlands Ecology Branch at the Southern Science Center, formerly known as the National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette LA. The Center also has field/duty stations in: Corpus Christi TX; Baton Rouge LA; Gulf Breeze FL; College Station TX, and Vicksburg MS. This branch consists of a multidisciplinary group of Ph.D. scientists, biological technicians, and support staff with research activities in coastal and freshwater wetland habitats, global climate change, moist soil management, plant stress, community and landscape ecology, wetland management and restoration, and food web relationships. The Southern Science Center has state-of-the-art laboratory, computer, and GIS facilities in a new building on the cam- pus of the University of Southwestern Louisiana. Minimum Qualifications: Ph.D. or equivalent experience in aquatic, wetland, or plant ecology or related field, administrative/managerial experience, experience in con- tract and grant administration, and a proven record of scientific achievement. Salary $58K+ per annum at the GS-14 level. The Federal Government is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer. For information con- tact Jan Whitmore at 318/266-8526 (e-mail whitmorej@nwrc.gov), National Biological Survey, Southern Science Center, 700 Cajundome Blvd., Lafayette LA 70506.

88

Director
Georgia Southern Botanical Garden
Georgia Southern University seeks a Director of its Botanical Garden to provide leadership for the next phase of the Garden's development. The ten-acre site will highlight natural habitat gardens focused on native plants. The Director must communicate effectively and have experience with proposal development and. fund-raising. The position is a 12-month administrative appointment. Academic rank and non-tenure track facility status are possible. A masters degree, formal training in plant science and at least 2 years of administrative experience are minimum requirements. Send letter of interest, curriculum vitae or resume, and the names and addresses of three references to Nancy Wright, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro GA 30460-8142. Screening will begin October 15, 1994. The names of applicants and nominees, vitae and other general non-evaluative information are subject to public inspection under the Georgia Open Records Act. Individual who need reasonable accommodations in order to participate in the application process should notify the search chair. Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

Molecular Systematics Post-Doc
University of Oklahoma
A post-doctoral position is immediately available (start date possibly 1 Jan 1995) for research on the molecular systematics of tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae). The study will include cpDNA restriction site mapping, sequencing of ndhE (cWoroplast gene), and phylogenetic analyses of molecular and morphological data. Subtribal and generic relationships will be examined to test hypotheses regarding phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography. In addition, issues surrounding combining diverse datasets for phylogenetic analysis will also be intensively explored. This position is funded for a three year period. For additional information, or to apply, please send a curriculum vitae with cover letter to Linda E. Watson, III E. Chesapeake St., Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK 73019. Telephone 405/325-5357; FAX: 405/325- 7702; email: lwatson@uoknor.edu.

IMAGE

Katherine Esau Postdoctral Fellowships
University of California
Applications and nominations are invited for Katherine Esau Postdoctoral Fellowships and which will be awarded to outstanding young scientists interested in developing careers in structural aspects of plant biology. Esau Fellowships will be awarded for a period of two years to enable successful candidates to work under the mentorship of a University of California, David, faculty member. Applications/nominations should identify an appropriate faculty mentor(s) and include a curriculum vitae of the candidate, reprints of published works, an outline of the proposed research that would be carried out under this program. The name and ad- dress of three references is also required. Requests for information regarding the fellowships and guidelines for applications can be made by contacting the Dean's Office, Division of Biological Sciences at 916{752- 6764. All application materials should be forwarded to Dr. William 1. Lucas, Chair, Faculty Advisory Committee, Esau Fellowships Program, Dean's Office, Division of Biological Sciences, university of California, Davis CA 95616. Fellowships will be awarded on a bi-annual basis; deadlines for this on-going program are June 1 and December 1. The University of California is an equal opportunity employer.

Greenhouse Manager/Lab Technician
Vassar College
The Department of Biology has an immediate opening for full time technician to manage the biology green- house and prepare laboratories for courses in introductory biology, botany, ecology and evolution. A degree in horticulture, botany or biology and some greenhouse experience are required. To apply, contact Faith Vincent, Personal Representative, Box 41, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave., Poughkeepsie, NY 12601- 6198 (phone 914-437-5821). Vassar College is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

Field Botanist
New York Botanical Garden
The Institute of Economic Botany of the New York Botanical Garden (NYBG) announces a position for Field Botanist (Ph.D or M.Sc. Level) with background in plant taxonomy and field experience within the United States. Duties are to collect, identify and voucher a broad range of plant taxa from the United States and its territories and possessions. Extensive travel is required. Successful applicant will participate in a study that assesses the potential utility of plant extracts in pharmaceutical products, as a part of a collaborati